Padjadjaran University - UNPAD vs Institute Technology of Bandung - ITB vs Telkom University vs National Institute of Technology - Itenas vs Pasundan University - UNPAS
Side-by-side comparison from 47 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Valuable practical experience and comprehensive subject knowledge
- +Strong academic reputation and promising future career prospects
- +Pleasant campus environment and experienced, diverse faculty
- +Rigorous academics and intellectually stimulating environment
- +Supportive and motivating community of peers and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong industry connections and vibrant campus life
- +Engaging professors and effective course content
- +Abundant laboratory facilities and strong alumni network
- +Clean campus and dedicated educators
Nothing to show
- +Diverse and inclusive campus culture
- +Rich learning environment fostering growth
- +Vibrant community engagement
Nothing to show
- +Practical and hands-on learning opportunities
- +Supportive environment for exploration and internships
- +Adequate campus facilities and size
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of practical application and career relevance is a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are prevalent complaints.
- -Communication breakdowns and a lack of transparency are recurring problems.
- -Poor communication and responsiveness from administration.
- -Lack of up-to-date facilities and resources.
- -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of essential resources and academic support causes dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are major drawbacks.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are frequently criticized for being ineffective.
Consistently strong scores define this university's reputation, with Student Life achieving the highest mark at 4.55. Professors and Location also garnered excellent feedback, both exceeding 4.35. While most areas received solid ratings, Facilities represent the lowest-scoring aspect, at 3.91, though still within a positive range. Accomodation, Internationality, and Value also demonstrate commendable performance.
This university demonstrates remarkable strengths in its faculty, earning a near-perfect 4.8 for Professors. Student life and internationality also stand out with excellent scores of 4.44 and 4.6, respectively. The lowest rated category is Accommodation, at 4.1, though all other areas, including Facilities, Location, and Value, remain highly positive.
This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas, with its **Value** and **Accomodation** receiving the highest marks. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also stand out as significant strengths. Conversely, the university's **Location** is rated comparatively lower than other aspects. Overall, it presents a strong offering, particularly in terms of student experience and perceived worth.
Nothing to show
This institution receives top marks for its excellent professors, reflecting a strong academic environment. While its location and accommodation received middling scores, most other aspects, including facilities, student life, internationality, and overall value, were rated highly. This suggests a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in teaching quality.
Nothing to show
This institution scores exceptionally well in student life and internationality, both receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. It also achieves a top score of 5 for value. Facilities, professors, and location are all rated a strong 4. The weakest area is accommodation, which received a rating of 3.
With 19 positive reviews out of 22, ~86% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and diverse academic opportunities. No negative reviews were received.
Students praise the university's intellectually stimulating academic environment, knowledgeable professors, and vibrant campus life, contributing to personal and professional growth. The university's strong national and international reputation is also highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 13 reviews, ~85% of students praise professors and the course. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This feedback strongly praises the university's embrace of cultural diversity and inclusivity, fostering a vibrant learning environment.
Nothing to show
Based on one review with an average rating of 4/5, the sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). The student appreciated the university's practical psychology program, which included hands-on skills and opportunities for exploration and internships.
Nothing to show
I feel its a great place to study. The lecturers, environment and the peer really bringing the best out of me and keep me motivated to do more. The connection to experts from industries and government was superb as well, since ITB's alumna were spread everywhere and become important leaders in their field. Some old classrooms were renovated but still maintain its historical facades.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I didn't like going to Maranatha at first because of the stigma between public and private university. But as time goes on, in the end i love this university because the psychology studies is not only with theories, but practical skill too. Students are allowed to explore more and learn about observation, interview, training, and even testing psychological tests. The campus is not too big, but enough to do everything. I got a lot of organization experiences and got a chance to become an intern in MCU.