Gadjah Mada University - UGM vs University of Sanata Dharma vs STIKes Madani vs Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir vs Duta Wacana Christian University - DWCU

Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Gadjah Mada University - UGM: wins 1/4 categories
University of Sanata Dharma: wins 0/4 categories
STIKes Madani: wins 0/4 categories
Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir: wins 0/4 categories
Duta Wacana Christian University - DWCU: wins 0/4 categories
Yogyakarta State University - UNY: wins 3/4 categories
University of Amikom Yogyakarta - AMIKOM: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
4.60
Read more reviews
30 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc Psychology
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Midwifery
Best programme: Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.30
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.59
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.57
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.17
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.50
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.63
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.20
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and faculty support
  • +Vibrant student community and campus culture
  • +Commitment to people's values and social responsibility

Nothing to show

  • +Islamic integration with healthcare courses
  • +Quranic memorization and Arabic language requirements
  • +Strong academic programs in nuclear technology
  • +Student-friendly environment in Yogyakarta
  • +Excellent laboratory facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, relevant curriculum
  • +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Focus on in-demand professional skills

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Unengaging teaching methods and a perceived lack of relevance in coursework are disliked.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a consistent concern.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is frustrating for students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners strong marks across most categories, with **Location** and **Value** standing out as particular strengths at 4.59 and 4.63 respectively. **Professors** also receive high praise. The weakest area appears to be **Internationality**, rated at 4.17, though this still represents a solid score. Facilities and accommodation also scored well, indicating a generally positive student experience.

Nothing to show

This institution receives excellent marks for its professors and overall value, both earning a perfect score. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also strong, each rated at a solid four. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating, coming in at a three. This indicates a generally positive experience with notable strengths in teaching quality and affordability.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution shines particularly brightly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving top marks. Student life and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a positive campus environment. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which received moderate scores. The overall value proposition appears strong.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptionally high ratings across the majority of surveyed categories, excelling particularly in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. The sole area requiring significant attention is Accomodation, which received a zero rating, indicating a substantial deficiency in this aspect.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, praising the university's strong academic reputation, excellent faculty, vibrant community, and social responsibility. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. Positive feedback (100%) highlights programs that integrate Islamic learning with academic courses like midwifery, nursing, and pharmacy, including mandatory Quran memorization and Arabic language.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university garners high praise for its student-friendly environment and strong academic programs. Positive comments highlight excellent laboratory facilities and specialized nuclear-related education.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a well-structured curriculum and experienced lecturers offering practical, relevant learning. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
70%
0%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
4★
23%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close