Gadjah Mada University - UGM vs Islamic University of Indonesia - UII vs Ahmad Dahlan University - UAD vs University of Sanata Dharma vs STIKes Madani
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and faculty support
- +Vibrant student community and campus culture
- +Commitment to people's values and social responsibility
- +Excellent, well-maintained facilities and up-to-date learning resources
- +Inspiring and cooperative lecturers with comfortable classrooms
- +Supportive Islamic environment promoting harmony and tolerance
- +Excellent academic foundation and personal growth opportunities.
- +Supportive and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.
- +Strong Islamic religious curriculum alongside formal education.
Nothing to show
- +Islamic integration with healthcare courses
- +Quranic memorization and Arabic language requirements
Nothing to show
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Focus on in-demand professional skills
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and a perceived lack of relevance in coursework are disliked.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of clear communication and organization.
- -Students are frustrated by administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -There is widespread dissatisfaction with outdated facilities and a lack of resources.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a consistent concern.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is frustrating for students.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
This institution garners strong marks across most categories, with **Location** and **Value** standing out as particular strengths at 4.59 and 4.63 respectively. **Professors** also receive high praise. The weakest area appears to be **Internationality**, rated at 4.17, though this still represents a solid score. Facilities and accommodation also scored well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This university garners excellent ratings across key aspects. Facilities stand out as the strongest area, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors, student life, and perceived value are also highly regarded. Location, accommodation, and internationality are consistently rated well, though slightly lower than the top-performing categories. Overall, the institution presents a very positive and well-rounded profile.
An institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, professors, and international appeal, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Student life and location also score well at 4.25. However, the university's value proposition registers as a comparative weakness, with a rating of 3.5, while accommodation sits at a respectable 4.
Nothing to show
This institution receives excellent marks for its professors and overall value, both earning a perfect score. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also strong, each rated at a solid four. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating, coming in at a three. This indicates a generally positive experience with notable strengths in teaching quality and affordability.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptionally high ratings across the majority of surveyed categories, excelling particularly in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. The sole area requiring significant attention is Accomodation, which received a zero rating, indicating a substantial deficiency in this aspect.
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, praising the university's strong academic reputation, excellent faculty, vibrant community, and social responsibility. No negative feedback was provided.
All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students frequently praise the excellent facilities, including journal access and technology resources. Lecturers are described as kind, fun, cooperative, and inspiring.
With 100% positive reviews, students report transformative experiences and strong academic/personal growth. They highlight enjoyable studies, effective teaching, and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is 4/5. Positive feedback (100%) highlights programs that integrate Islamic learning with academic courses like midwifery, nursing, and pharmacy, including mandatory Quran memorization and Arabic language.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a well-structured curriculum and experienced lecturers offering practical, relevant learning. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Being a student at UII seems to be a matter of prestige because the tuition fees are quite expensive. However, the supporting facilities and teaching materials make the word "price" completely irrelevant. Supporting facilities such as international journals, free accounts to access Microsoft Offices, Spotify, computer lab space and WiFi with fairly fast speeds are provided. Teaching materials are always of international standard with case studies that increase knowledge at every class meeting. It's not just about learning activities, but facilities to support student creativity such as a podcast room, filming equipment, content studio, and editing software are also provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show