Mouloud Mammeri de Tizi Ouzou University - UMMTO vs European University Viadrina Frankfurt vs University of Malakand vs Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás - PUCGO vs Stikes Nani Hasanuddin - Stikes Nani Hasanuddin

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás - PUCGO (5.00)
Mouloud Mammeri de Tizi Ouzou University - UMMTO: wins 0/6 categories
European University Viadrina Frankfurt: wins 0/6 categories
University of Malakand: wins 0/6 categories
Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás - PUCGO: wins 6/6 categories
Stikes Nani Hasanuddin - Stikes Nani Hasanuddin : wins 0/6 categories
University of Education Lahore: wins 0/6 categories
College of Business Education - CBE: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Urban Planning
Best programme: International Business Administration
Best programme: Arabic and Islamic Studies
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Education in Educational Leadership
Category ratings
Facilities
2.50
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
3.00
Location
3.00
3.50
4.40
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Professors
4.50
4.50
4.40
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Internationality
3.00
4.50
3.80
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
1.00
Student life
3.00
4.00
3.75
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
2.50
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
2.00
Accommodation
2.50
4.50
4.20
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Scenic campus and natural environment
  • +Peaceful and calming atmosphere
  • +International perspective and multicultural atmosphere
  • +Interdisciplinary programs and academic quality
  • +Exchange opportunities and networking
  • +Supportive faculty and engaging academic programs
  • +Peaceful campus environment conducive to learning
  • +Positive community and accommodation facilities
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities.
  • +High-quality professors and industry professionals.
  • +Strong sense of community and networking opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive teaching and academic focus
  • +Improvement in punctuality and information flow
  • +Resolution of student issues

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and lacks practical application.
  • -Poor administrative support and management.
  • -Outdated or insufficient facilities.
  • -Unengaging or poorly delivered course content.
  • -Unresponsive administration and poor communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum relevance.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum or teaching quality is a recurring point of dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

An analysis of recent ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive academic environment. The university excels notably in the quality of its professors, receiving a high score of 4.5. Conversely, its weakest areas are facilities and accommodation, both rated at 2.5. Other aspects such as location, student life, internationality, and overall value are consistently rated at a moderate 3.

This university garners excellent feedback, particularly for its **facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality**, all scoring a high 4.5. Student life and overall value also received strong marks of 4. The **location**, however, stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5. This indicates a generally positive university experience with a specific area for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates commendable strengths in its faculty and location, both earning a high 4.4 rating. Accommodations are also well-regarded at 4.2. Student life, while decent at 3.75, represents the lowest-scoring area. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, with a particular emphasis on academic and geographical advantages.

Exceptional ratings characterize this institution, with a perfect score of 5 in every surveyed category. This indicates outstanding performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No single area stands out as a particular strength or weakness, as all aspects are rated equally high, suggesting a consistently excellent experience for students.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in **Student Life** with a perfect score. Facilities also stand out at an impressive 4.5. Conversely, while still strong, Professors, Location, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value all hover around a solid 4. This suggests a vibrant student experience and excellent resources, with other aspects performing reliably well.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~50% express positive sentiment focusing on scenic views and a peaceful environment. There is no negative feedback present.

With two positive reviews and an average rating of 4/5, the university is praised for its international perspective, interdisciplinary focus, and multicultural atmosphere. Positive feedback highlights exchange opportunities and updated professors.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.4/5. Recurring themes highlight an amazing campus, incredible and supportive faculty, and enriching academic programs.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The positive feedback highlights excellent infrastructure and professors. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight effective teaching and a supportive environment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
40%
100%
0%
50%
0%
4★
50%
100%
60%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

College of business education

The university is cool but there are some challenges such as 1.poor technology 2.shortage of teaching tools 3.poor systems Also students are faced with shortage of halls that they will be using it to study

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close