Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST vs Comsats University - CUI vs Islamabad Medical and Dental College - IMDC vs National University of Modern Languages vs Hazara University

Side-by-side comparison from 111 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE (5.00)
Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST: wins 0/7 categories
Comsats University - CUI: wins 0/7 categories
Islamabad Medical and Dental College - IMDC: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Modern Languages: wins 3/7 categories
Hazara University: wins 1/7 categories
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE: wins 3/7 categories
Abasyn University Islamabad Campus: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Islamabad, Pakistan
4.30
Read more reviews
67 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: English Literature and Linguistics
Islamabad, Pakistan
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
3.78
Not rated
4.08
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.13
3.60
Not rated
4.83
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.44
4.30
Not rated
4.40
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.25
3.99
Not rated
4.28
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.07
4.22
Not rated
4.25
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
3.75
4.21
Not rated
4.44
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
2.63
3.29
Not rated
3.96
Win
3.50
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and qualified faculty providing engaging guidance.
  • +High-quality programs with a focus on student development.
  • +Inspiring atmosphere and excellent facilities.
  • +Quality education and expert faculty
  • +Professional growth and diverse programmes
  • +Affordable tuition and good employment prospects

Nothing to show

  • +World-class faculty and teaching quality
  • +Strong academic programs and curriculum
  • +Supportive and disciplined learning environment
  • +Good teachers and teaching quality.
  • +Positive learning environment.
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Career development guidance

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
  • -Unprofessional attitudes from supervisors and the management team.
  • -Administrative and management issues.

Nothing to show

  • -Unfair grading and biased/rude teacher conduct are common.
  • -Unprofessional and disrespectful administrative and faculty behavior is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum is seen as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of essential resources and effective support systems hinder learning.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student life aspects generally shine, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.07) and **Location** (4.13) also scoring well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a clear area for improvement, indicated by the lowest rating (2.63). **Facilities** (3.69) and **Value** (3.75) fall in the mid-range, while **Internationality** (3.25) scores moderately.

An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Notably, **Professors** and **Student Life** received the highest scores, indicating strengths in academic instruction and campus engagement. **Value** also performed very well. Conversely, **Accomodation** garnered the lowest rating, suggesting this is the weakest area. While **Facilities** and **Location** received moderate scores, **Internationality** was also rated favorably.

Nothing to show

An analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive picture. The strongest area is undoubtedly location, with an impressive score of 4.83. Professors and value also stand out with high marks of 4.4 and 4.44 respectively. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating at 3.96, indicating this may be an area for improvement. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded.

This institution garners strong marks in several key areas. Student life and professor quality both achieved an impressive 4.5, indicating a vibrant campus and excellent academic staff. Facilities and internationality also received solid ratings of 4. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.5, suggesting potential room for improvement in this aspect. Overall, the university offers a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its academic and social offerings.

With outstanding scores in teaching quality and global outlook, this institution shines brightly. Professors are highly rated at a perfect 5, mirroring the exceptional internationality. Conversely, the university's location and accommodation options received more moderate feedback, both scoring a 3. Facilities and student life are well-regarded, achieving solid 4s, while the overall value proposition is also rated a perfect 5, indicating strong satisfaction in these areas.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.06/5, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly atmospheres, helpful teachers, and engaging classes. Negative feedback is minimal, representing about 0% of all feedback.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~84% of 67 reviews) for its high-quality education, expert faculty, and professional development opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~1.5%) mentions unprofessional attitudes from supervisors and management.

Nothing to show

Nearly all (96%) of university reviews are positive, highlighting quality faculty, teaching, and learning environments. A small percentage (4%) of negative feedback mentions issues with grading fairness, teacher rudeness, and unprofessional staff.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good teaching and a positive university experience.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4–5 stars. Students particularly praise the faculty's helpfulness and openness, along with their guidance on professional and career development.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
31%
52%
0%
52%
50%
100%
0%
4★
44%
31%
0%
44%
50%
0%
0%
3★
25%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
1%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Bachelor in Biosciences

Experience was over all good but they more focus on theocratical work rather than lab work related to field and now am in my last year of bachelors degree so hoping best and inshallah overall experience will be good

Nothing to show

NUML

Numl is one of the best universities in Pakistan. Numl is also internationally recognised. It provides quality education and great sports, library, and scholarship facilities to its students. NUML has good faculty and administration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close