Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST vs Quaid-i-Azam University - QAU vs Comsats University - CUI vs National University of Science and Technology - NUST vs Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST
Side-by-side comparison from 171 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and qualified faculty providing engaging guidance.
- +High-quality programs with a focus on student development.
- +Inspiring atmosphere and excellent facilities.
- +Strong academic programs and research focus.
- +Highly cooperative and approachable faculty.
- +Sense of community and belonging among students.
- +Quality education and expert faculty
- +Professional growth and diverse programmes
- +Affordable tuition and good employment prospects
- +Supportive faculty and well-structured courses, particularly in engineering, IT, and management
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous clubs, societies, and events
- +Research focus and analytical development, with programs relevant to industry
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive faculty.
- +Valuable development of critical soft skills and personal confidence.
- +Scholarships and diverse program offerings.
- +Good teachers and teaching quality.
- +Positive learning environment.
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Career development guidance
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause student difficulties.
- -Outdated or insufficient facilities hinder the student experience.
- -Unprofessional attitudes from supervisors and the management team.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated curriculum and lack of engaging events.
- -Toxic university environment and frequent illness among students.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of support negatively impact student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is seen as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
- -Lack of essential resources and effective support systems hinder learning.
Academic and student life aspects generally shine, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.07) and **Location** (4.13) also scoring well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a clear area for improvement, indicated by the lowest rating (2.63). **Facilities** (3.69) and **Value** (3.75) fall in the mid-range, while **Internationality** (3.25) scores moderately.
Excelling in student life and value, this university receives particularly high marks for its student experience and perceived worth. Professors and location also score well, indicating positive aspects in these areas. However, facilities and accommodation represent the lower-rated categories, suggesting potential areas for improvement. Internationality is rated moderately.
An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Notably, **Professors** and **Student Life** received the highest scores, indicating strengths in academic instruction and campus engagement. **Value** also performed very well. Conversely, **Accomodation** garnered the lowest rating, suggesting this is the weakest area. While **Facilities** and **Location** received moderate scores, **Internationality** was also rated favorably.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with its **Location** standing out as the strongest area, achieving a rating of 4.47. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received favorable scores around 4.1 and 4.2 respectively. Areas for potential improvement include **Internationality** and **Accomodation**, which received lower ratings of 3.59 and 3.76. **Value** for money is also a significant strength at 4.27.
This university's ratings show a mixed performance. Academics and campus experience are notable strengths, with Professors receiving a high mark of 4 and Student Life scoring a respectable 3.6. However, the university faces challenges in its physical environment and student support, as indicated by lower scores for Location and Accommodation, both at 2.8. Internationality and Value are moderately rated.
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas. Student life and professor quality both achieved an impressive 4.5, indicating a vibrant campus and excellent academic staff. Facilities and internationality also received solid ratings of 4. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.5, suggesting potential room for improvement in this aspect. Overall, the university offers a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its academic and social offerings.
With outstanding scores in teaching quality and global outlook, this institution shines brightly. Professors are highly rated at a perfect 5, mirroring the exceptional internationality. Conversely, the university's location and accommodation options received more moderate feedback, both scoring a 3. Facilities and student life are well-regarded, achieving solid 4s, while the overall value proposition is also rated a perfect 5, indicating strong satisfaction in these areas.
With an average rating of 4.06/5, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly atmospheres, helpful teachers, and engaging classes. Negative feedback is minimal, representing about 0% of all feedback.
Approximately 74% of 29 reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, research emphasis, and inspiring learning environments. A single negative review, about 3.5%, mentioned financial issues impacting student facilities.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~84% of 67 reviews) for its high-quality education, expert faculty, and professional development opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~1.5%) mentions unprofessional attitudes from supervisors and management.
Around 80% of 51 reviews praise the university's amazing environment, supportive faculty, and strong campus life. A few (~4%) mention outdated curriculum or a toxic environment.
With a 4.8/5 average rating from 5 reviews, students highlight strong academics and knowledgeable, supportive faculty. Scholarship opportunities are also a significant positive. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good teaching and a positive university experience.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4–5 stars. Students particularly praise the faculty's helpfulness and openness, along with their guidance on professional and career development.
Nothing to show
Quaid-i-Azam University is a very good option for the students of Pakistan. It is the best university of Pakistan. I belong to psychology department and have completed my masters from this university in mid 2020. It is a public university. The university has best Natural sciences department in whole Pakistan. Talking about its professors they are one of the most talented professors of Pakistan. Talking about its international status again being the best university in Pakistan. Many students from Asia and Africa comes to Quaid-i-Azam university. The location of this university is very good as it is present in Islamabad the capital of Pakistan. The university area wise is huge. Talking about its student life its not very good nor very bad either the main problem is religions groups of the university that are the main problem. Accommodation is poor hostels are present but i personally would prefer talking hostel outside of campus. Facilities are present and are good.
Experience was over all good but they more focus on theocratical work rather than lab work related to field and now am in my last year of bachelors degree so hoping best and inshallah overall experience will be good
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show