Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST vs Birla Institute of Technology and Science - BITS Pilani vs Osmania Univercity - OU vs Telengana University vs Malla Reddy College of Engineering and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Telengana University (5.00)
Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST: wins 0/6 categories
Birla Institute of Technology and Science - BITS Pilani: wins 3/6 categories
Osmania Univercity - OU: wins 2/6 categories
Telengana University: wins 1/6 categories
Malla Reddy College of Engineering and Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Keshav Memorial Engineering College: wins 0/6 categories
University of Hyderabad - Uoh/ Hcu: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Commerce
Hyderabad, India
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
4.42
4.27
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.13
4.33
4.55
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.44
4.17
4.45
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.25
4.25
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.07
4.58
Win
4.55
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.75
4.42
Win
4.27
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.63
4.00
3.40
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and qualified faculty providing engaging guidance.
  • +High-quality programs with a focus on student development.
  • +Inspiring atmosphere and excellent facilities.
  • +Excellent faculty and peer learning environment
  • +Strong infrastructure and campus facilities
  • +Abundant career and placement opportunities
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Practical, application-focused education
  • +Active campus life and extracurriculars
  • +focus on sustainability and eco-friendly campus initiatives

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum is a major concern.
  • -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often seen as uninspiring or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student life aspects generally shine, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.07) and **Location** (4.13) also scoring well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a clear area for improvement, indicated by the lowest rating (2.63). **Facilities** (3.69) and **Value** (3.75) fall in the mid-range, while **Internationality** (3.25) scores moderately.

Student feedback reveals a generally positive university experience, with **Student Life** being the strongest area, achieving a score of 4.58. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest point, rated at 4. The university also scores well in **Facilities** and **Value** (both 4.42), with **Location** (4.33), **Internationality** (4.25), and **Professors** (4.17) also receiving favorable assessments.

This institution garners high marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a rating of 4.55. **Professors** also score exceptionally well at 4.45. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3.4. Other areas like **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

This institution excels in its facilities, earning a perfect score. It also performs well in professor quality, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a strong 4 out of 5. The most significant area for improvement, however, is student life, which received a rating of 0.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.06/5, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly atmospheres, helpful teachers, and engaging classes. Negative feedback is minimal, representing about 0% of all feedback.

With an average rating of 4.42/5 from 12 reviews, ~92% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise intellectual peers, excellent labs, helpful faculty, and strong career opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.

Nearly all feedback is positive, with ~100% of 11 reviews rating 4-5 stars. Students praise supportive staff and knowledgeable professors, citing effective, practical education. Minor facility improvements were noted.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights academic excellence and sustainability, praising the university's eco-friendly initiatives like paperless classrooms and recycling programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
31%
50%
55%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
44%
42%
36%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
25%
8%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close