Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC vs Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN vs Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB (5.00)
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN: wins 1/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
5.00
Win
4.20
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.57
Win
4.00
3.40
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.57
4.00
4.60
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.29
5.00
Win
3.20
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.71
Win
4.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.43
Win
2.00
4.40
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.71
4.00
3.60
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, experienced faculty
  • +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
  • +Excellent academic training and professional growth opportunities
  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities
  • +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
  • +Excellent preparation for the labor market
  • +University prestige and history
  • +Excellent teaching quality and teacher attentiveness
  • +High-quality education provided by the institution
  • +Professional development & industry relevance
  • +Life projects & research opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administration.
  • -Outdated or insufficient facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of responsiveness to student concerns is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and equipment are consistently outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Instructors' teaching quality and availability are often insufficient.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations across numerous aspects. Student life and accommodation stand out as the strongest areas, achieving the highest scores. Conversely, internationality is rated slightly lower than other categories, representing the weakest performing metric. Facilities and value received comparable, solid ratings, while professor and location scores were also very strong.

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.

Offering a truly standout experience, this university excels in its **Accomodation**, achieving a perfect score. Its **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are also strong points, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. The university's **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** are rated competently at 3, indicating areas for potential development alongside its already impressive strengths.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received uniform ratings. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent scoring suggests an even distribution of perceived quality across these key aspects of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and strong professional training.

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.

The single review expresses strong satisfaction, particularly praising the excellent teaching approach and thoroughness of instructors. This positive feedback represents 100% of the feedback, with an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's professional development and real-world opportunities. One reviewer suggested incorporating more training on modern technologies like Azure and Big Data.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
86%
100%
83%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
14%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close