Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Fundación Universidad de América vs Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE vs Universidad Libre - UniLibre

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO (4.90)
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 1/5 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 0/5 categories
Fundación Universidad de América: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE: wins 1/5 categories
Universidad Libre - UniLibre: wins 3/5 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/5 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
5.00
1.00
4.33
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.57
4.50
1.00
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.57
4.50
1.00
4.67
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.29
Win
2.00
1.00
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.71
4.50
1.00
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.43
5.00
1.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.71
4.00
1.00
3.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, experienced faculty
  • +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
  • +Excellent academic training and professional growth opportunities
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Supportive and high-quality teaching
  • +Ample green campus spaces
  • +Excellent professors and quality education/curriculum
  • +Strong focus on ethics and humanistic values
  • +Downtown campus offering urban experience
  • +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
  • +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
  • +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administration.
  • -Outdated or insufficient facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
  • -Poor administrative and management practices.
  • -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient academic support are disliked.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations across numerous aspects. Student life and accommodation stand out as the strongest areas, achieving the highest scores. Conversely, internationality is rated slightly lower than other categories, representing the weakest performing metric. Facilities and value received comparable, solid ratings, while professor and location scores were also very strong.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with an outstanding perfect score for **Value** and high marks for its **Professors**. The **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received solid ratings. However, **Accomodation** is a moderately weaker area, and **Internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and strong professional training.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students praise excellent teachers, quality education, and professional training that instills values and ethics.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
86%
67%
0%
33%
33%
0%
0%
4★
14%
33%
50%
67%
67%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The worst experience

Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close