Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB: wins 1/7 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/7 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL: wins 5/7 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fashion Engineering
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: General Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
Not rated
3.80
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
Not rated
4.17
5.00
Win
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
3.88
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
4.20
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, accredited programs with well-equipped facilities and practical application of knowledge.
  • +Emphasis on creativity, research, and instilling strong values for responsible and ethical professionals.
  • +Opportunities for diverse practical experiences and national/international student exchange programs.
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Diverse faculties and engaging university activities
  • +Strong analytical and technical skills, especially in mathematics and data
  • +Passion for learning and pursuing advanced studies
  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of career services and job placement support.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts impressive strengths in several key areas. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received excellent ratings of 4. Professors also garnered positive feedback with a score of 4. However, facilities represent a weaker point, scoring a 3, while the location received no rating.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

This institution earns excellent scores in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a strong foundation. Student life and internationality are areas for potential growth, with both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture, particularly in its core offerings and infrastructure.

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the high quality physiotherapy program, creative curriculum, and emphasis on developing responsible, dedicated professionals. Facilities and learning tools are also noted as beneficial.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

With an average rating of 5/5, university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Feedback highlights strong mathematical interests and analytical skills, alongside participation in research and academic events. The university offers diverse faculties and engaging activities.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
100%
43%
100%
56%
0%
0%
4★
75%
0%
29%
0%
44%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close