Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES (5.00)
Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 0/5 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 3/5 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 2/5 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/5 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fashion Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Management
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Best programme: General Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.33
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.88
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
3.67
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, accredited programs with well-equipped facilities and practical application of knowledge.
  • +Emphasis on creativity, research, and instilling strong values for responsible and ethical professionals.
  • +Opportunities for diverse practical experiences and national/international student exchange programs.
  • +Supportive environment & student well-being
  • +Academic focus & professional growth
  • +Welcoming campus & convenient location
  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of career services and job placement support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts impressive strengths in several key areas. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received excellent ratings of 4. Professors also garnered positive feedback with a score of 4. However, facilities represent a weaker point, scoring a 3, while the location received no rating.

This institution receives notable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** also present solid performance, averaging a 4.0. The university's **Student Life** is rated moderately well at 3.67, while **Internationality** stands as its weakest area with a score of 3.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the high quality physiotherapy program, creative curriculum, and emphasis on developing responsible, dedicated professionals. Facilities and learning tools are also noted as beneficial.

With 3.8/5 stars from 5 reviews, ~60% are positive, praising a cozy, well-located environment supporting professional growth and well-being. Academics are prioritized. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
20%
0%
100%
56%
0%
0%
4★
75%
40%
50%
0%
44%
0%
0%
3★
0%
40%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close