Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB: wins 2/6 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 1/6 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fashion Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Management
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Win
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, accredited programs with well-equipped facilities and practical application of knowledge.
  • +Emphasis on creativity, research, and instilling strong values for responsible and ethical professionals.
  • +Opportunities for diverse practical experiences and national/international student exchange programs.

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive environment & student well-being
  • +Academic focus & professional growth
  • +Welcoming campus & convenient location
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of career services and job placement support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts impressive strengths in several key areas. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received excellent ratings of 4. Professors also garnered positive feedback with a score of 4. However, facilities represent a weaker point, scoring a 3, while the location received no rating.

Nothing to show

This institution receives notable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** also present solid performance, averaging a 4.0. The university's **Student Life** is rated moderately well at 3.67, while **Internationality** stands as its weakest area with a score of 3.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the high quality physiotherapy program, creative curriculum, and emphasis on developing responsible, dedicated professionals. Facilities and learning tools are also noted as beneficial.

Nothing to show

With 3.8/5 stars from 5 reviews, ~60% are positive, praising a cozy, well-located environment supporting professional growth and well-being. Academics are prioritized. No negative feedback was reported.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
0%
20%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
75%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close