London School of Commerce - LSC vs Alhaj Mockbul Hossain University College vs Uttara University vs Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University - SAU vs Canadian University of Bangladesh

Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/2 categories
Alhaj Mockbul Hossain University College: wins 0/2 categories
Uttara University: wins 2/2 categories
Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University - SAU: wins 0/2 categories
Canadian University of Bangladesh: wins 0/2 categories
Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology, Gazipur (DUET) - DUET: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Dhaka, Bangladesh
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Human Resource Management
Best programme: Veterinary Medicine
Best programme: Marine Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
3.25
Not rated
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Student life
3.75
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
2.75
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Highly qualified and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent classes and effective teaching methods
  • +Specialized agricultural and veterinary programs.
  • +Strong academic foundation and research opportunities.
  • +Renowned as Bangladesh's oldest agricultural institution.
  • +Practical and theoretical teaching methods
  • +Friendly faculty and supportive environment

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are often mentioned.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent concerns.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are significant problems.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized as inadequate.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Across all surveyed categories, this institution achieves perfect scores. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as excellent. This indicates a consistently strong offering with no discernible weaknesses, presenting an ideal environment for students.

This institution garners significant praise, particularly excelling in its prime **location** and vibrant **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. Offering excellent **value** also stands out. While generally strong, the **facilities**, **professors**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are rated slightly lower at a commendable four out of five, indicating solid but not perfect performance in these areas.

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly in its facilities, professors, location, and student life, all receiving perfect scores. Its value for money is also highly rated at 5. Accommodation scores a commendable 4. The university's internationality, however, stands out as its weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

Based on one review, the university received a 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlighted qualified faculty and excellent classes with effective teaching methods.

This university receives excellent feedback, with 100% positive reviews. Students highlight its status as an old agricultural institution and its four faculties offering various degrees. The average rating is 4/5.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's practical and theoretical teaching methods. The educational faculty and environment are also highlighted as friendly and supportive.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
4★
25%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close