London School of Commerce - LSC vs Sonargaon University - SU vs Royal University Of Dhaka vs International University of Business Agriculture and Technology - IUBAT vs State University of Bangladesh

Side-by-side comparison from 8 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: International University of Business Agriculture and Technology - IUBAT (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
Sonargaon University - SU: wins 1/7 categories
Royal University Of Dhaka: wins 0/7 categories
International University of Business Agriculture and Technology - IUBAT: wins 6/7 categories
State University of Bangladesh: wins 0/7 categories
Bangladesh University of Health Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Fashion and Design Management
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in Electrical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.75
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.25
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.75
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.75
3.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable faculty
  • +Practical learning and industry-relevant skills development
  • +Career-oriented and industry-ready focus

Nothing to show

  • +Pioneering, visionary institution
  • +Commitment to producing professional graduates

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Focus on profit over education.
  • -Lack of genuine concern for student learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are significant concerns.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution excels in its faculty, with professors receiving a strong 4.5 rating. Internationality is also a notable strength at 4. Areas such as facilities, student life, and accommodation represent potential opportunities for improvement, all scoring a moderate 3. The university offers a respectable location and value, with ratings of 3.5 and 3 respectively.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. **Student Life** also received a top rating of 5. The university demonstrates a strong commitment to **Internationality** and offers good **Value**, both rated at 4.5. Its **Professors** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded, each earning a 4, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Reviews show a mixed sentiment, with 1 positive and 1 negative review. Half of the feedback is negative, citing financial focus over education. Positive comments highlight supportive faculty and industry-relevant skills.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the university's pioneering role and its founding vision. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close