London School of Commerce - LSC vs Informatics Institute of Technology - IIT vs Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology vs Uva Wellassa University of Sri Lanka vs Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation - APIIT
Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Globally recognized IT degrees from reputable UK universities
- +Encouragement of extracurricular activities alongside academics
- +Dedicated and helpful lecturers
- +Practical courses and knowledgeable, helpful lecturers
- +Good campus facilities and opportunities for growth
- +Strong academic reputation and graduate placements
Nothing to show
- +Strong academics with practical, industry-relevant skills.
- +Diverse, international environment fostering cultural understanding.
- +Responsive and helpful professors.
- +Highly reputable accounting and finance qualification
- +Strong parliamentary backing and recognition
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Poor teaching quality and disorganized project management are major complaints.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a perceived lack of support are recurring complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion and dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution shows a mixed but generally positive performance across key metrics. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, closely followed by location and professor quality. However, the university faces challenges with its facilities and accommodation, which received significantly lower scores. Student life also presents an area for improvement, while value for money is rated solidly in the middle.
Outstanding performance is evident in the university's facilities, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors and value also received very strong marks. Student life and location are rated favorably, with internationality also proving to be a positive aspect. However, accommodation presents a notable area for improvement, with a significantly lower rating compared to other metrics.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Value**, earning high scores in both areas. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also receive positive marks. However, **Accomodation** presents a significant weakness, with the lowest rating. **Location** also indicates room for improvement, falling below the average for other metrics.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional performance. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently strong offering with no discernible weak areas. The university excels uniformly, providing an outstanding experience for its students.
Nothing to show
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
With an average rating of 3.33/5, university reviews indicate ~67% positive feedback praising reputable UK degrees, helpful lecturers, and extracurricular engagement. However, ~33% of reviews express dissatisfaction, citing a lack of quality facilities and frustrating project experiences.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 8 reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical courses, helpful lecturers, and good internship opportunities. Minor administrative slowness was noted once.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong program foundations, a balance of theory and practical experience, and a diverse international environment. Some note areas for improvement like increased industry exposure and occasional professor responsiveness issues.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. This single review highlights it as the best accounting and finance knowledge provider in Sri Lanka.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
In my opinion, the Informatics Institute of Technology (IIT) gives its students a well balanced academic experience providing them with the opportunity to engage in multiple extracurricular activities while granting the ability to hold globally recognized IT related degrees. The only flaw I see in this overall pleasant academic experience is the lack of quality in facilities. Other than that, the Informatics Institute of Technology excels in providing a fine academic experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
