London School of Commerce - LSC vs Holy Family Red Crescent Medical College - HFRCMC vs Islamic University of Technology - IUT vs State University of Bangladesh vs Anwer Khan Modern University

Side-by-side comparison from 6 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Islamic University of Technology - IUT (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 1/7 categories
Holy Family Red Crescent Medical College - HFRCMC: wins 0/7 categories
Islamic University of Technology - IUT: wins 6/7 categories
State University of Bangladesh: wins 0/7 categories
Anwer Khan Modern University: wins 0/7 categories
First Capital University of Bangladesh: wins 0/7 categories
Ishakha International University Bangladesh: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.25
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Global exposure and strong peer quality
  • +Supportive faculty and community
  • +Excellent career outcomes and alumni network

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff cause frustration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

This institution receives overwhelmingly positive marks, excelling particularly in its **facilities**, **student life**, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value**, all scoring a perfect five. The weakest area, though still strong, is the **professors**, rated at four. The **location** also garnered a solid four.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight global exposure, strong peer quality, and excellent career outcomes. A sense of community and supportive faculty are also recurring themes.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close