London School of Commerce - LSC vs Holy Family Red Crescent Medical College - HFRCMC vs National College of Home Economics - NCHE vs Shanto Mariam University of Creative Technology vs Military Institute of Science and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 6 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 1/6 categories
Holy Family Red Crescent Medical College - HFRCMC: wins 0/6 categories
National College of Home Economics - NCHE: wins 3/6 categories
Shanto Mariam University of Creative Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Military Institute of Science and Technology: wins 2/6 categories
State University of Bangladesh: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Children
Best programme: Aeronautical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
3.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
Win
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
3.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
2.75
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Sincere and helpful teachers
  • +Classes and exams on schedule with no session congestion
  • +Future improvements expected with permanent campus

Nothing to show

  • +strong academics and excellent labs
  • +well-structured curriculum for theory and practice
  • +no session jams, timely graduation

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and uninspired course content are often criticized.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in areas like **Professors** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are also strong, earning a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present significant weaknesses, with ratings of 2. Overall, the university offers a positive experience in key academic and social aspects, though improvements are needed in housing and global integration.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its **location** and **accommodation**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities** and **student life** also score well, indicating a supportive and well-equipped campus environment. However, **professors**, **internationality**, and **value** received average ratings, suggesting potential areas for development compared to its other strengths.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

The sole review is positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight sincere teachers and timely classes/exams, while noting temporary difficulties due to the lack of a permanent campus.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 from one review, the Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST) is praised for its strong academic environment and excellent lab facilities. Students appreciate the well-structured curriculum and the absence of session jams, allowing for timely graduation.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close