London School of Commerce - LSC vs International College of Business and Technology - ICBT vs Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology vs University of Colombo vs Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka - SUSL
Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Excellent, dedicated lecturers and advanced teaching techniques
- +Diverse course offerings and well-equipped facilities
- +Positive student life and overall supportive campus environment
- +Practical courses and knowledgeable, helpful lecturers
- +Good campus facilities and opportunities for growth
- +Strong academic reputation and graduate placements
- +High-quality, internationally-graded education across diverse programs
- +Rewarding academic journeys with dedicated lecturers
- +Opportunities for personal growth and student independence
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Highly reputable accounting and finance qualification
- +Strong parliamentary backing and recognition
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a perceived lack of support are recurring complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion and dissatisfaction.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution receives high marks across the board. Notably, professors, student life, and value are exceptionally strong areas, each earning a rating of 4.625. Internationality and location also score well at 4.25 and 4.375, respectively. The weakest area, though still solid, is facilities, rated at 4.0.
Outstanding performance is evident in the university's facilities, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors and value also received very strong marks. Student life and location are rated favorably, with internationality also proving to be a positive aspect. However, accommodation presents a notable area for improvement, with a significantly lower rating compared to other metrics.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with particular strengths in its **professors**, scoring an impressive 4.67, and a high rating for **value** at 4.5. **Location** also received strong marks. **Accommodations** emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3. Other aspects like **facilities**, **student life**, and **internationality** received solid ratings around 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional performance. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently strong offering with no discernible weak areas. The university excels uniformly, providing an outstanding experience for its students.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent lecturers and flexible class timings, alongside well-equipped labs and facilities. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 8 reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical courses, helpful lecturers, and good internship opportunities. Minor administrative slowness was noted once.
With a 4/5 average rating from 6 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight high academic standards, rewarding experiences, and independence.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. This single review highlights it as the best accounting and finance knowledge provider in Sri Lanka.
Nothing to show
I am a student of Bsc (Hons) Nursing 07th batch (Galle branch). I recommend ICBT Galle branch to start Nursing Bsc and this is the best place for it. They have very excellent lecturers and progress is also very consistent. I really appreciate the dedication of previous Coordinator Miss Kanchana Panditha (presently Miss Kanchana Panditha-Assistant Manager-Academic Administration). Undergraduate Department, ICBT Colombo Camp) . All the best
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
