London School of Commerce - LSC vs International College of Business and Technology - ICBT vs Informatics Institute of Technology - IIT vs BMS Colombo Graduate School vs Nawaloka College of higher studies - NCHS
Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Excellent, dedicated lecturers and advanced teaching techniques
- +Diverse course offerings and well-equipped facilities
- +Positive student life and overall supportive campus environment
- +Globally recognized IT degrees from reputable UK universities
- +Encouragement of extracurricular activities alongside academics
- +Dedicated and helpful lecturers
- +Supportive and motivating lecturers and staff
- +Flexible weekend programs for working students
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong academics with practical, industry-relevant skills.
- +Diverse, international environment fostering cultural understanding.
- +Responsive and helpful professors.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Poor teaching quality and disorganized project management are major complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient student support lead to a negative experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and curriculum.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution receives high marks across the board. Notably, professors, student life, and value are exceptionally strong areas, each earning a rating of 4.625. Internationality and location also score well at 4.25 and 4.375, respectively. The weakest area, though still solid, is facilities, rated at 4.0.
This institution shows a mixed but generally positive performance across key metrics. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, closely followed by location and professor quality. However, the university faces challenges with its facilities and accommodation, which received significantly lower scores. Student life also presents an area for improvement, while value for money is rated solidly in the middle.
This university garners strong marks in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its professors. Facilities, location, student life, and internationality all received solid ratings of 4. Accommodations represent a comparatively weaker area with a score of 3. Overall, it offers a positive experience with excellent teaching and good campus resources.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Value**, earning high scores in both areas. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also receive positive marks. However, **Accomodation** presents a significant weakness, with the lowest rating. **Location** also indicates room for improvement, falling below the average for other metrics.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent lecturers and flexible class timings, alongside well-equipped labs and facilities. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 3.33/5, university reviews indicate ~67% positive feedback praising reputable UK degrees, helpful lecturers, and extracurricular engagement. However, ~33% of reviews express dissatisfaction, citing a lack of quality facilities and frustrating project experiences.
The single review was positive (100%), giving a 4/5 average. Feedback highlighted supportive lecturers and staff and convenient weekend degree programs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong program foundations, a balance of theory and practical experience, and a diverse international environment. Some note areas for improvement like increased industry exposure and occasional professor responsiveness issues.
Nothing to show
I am a student of Bsc (Hons) Nursing 07th batch (Galle branch). I recommend ICBT Galle branch to start Nursing Bsc and this is the best place for it. They have very excellent lecturers and progress is also very consistent. I really appreciate the dedication of previous Coordinator Miss Kanchana Panditha (presently Miss Kanchana Panditha-Assistant Manager-Academic Administration). Undergraduate Department, ICBT Colombo Camp) . All the best
In my opinion, the Informatics Institute of Technology (IIT) gives its students a well balanced academic experience providing them with the opportunity to engage in multiple extracurricular activities while granting the ability to hold globally recognized IT related degrees. The only flaw I see in this overall pleasant academic experience is the lack of quality in facilities. Other than that, the Informatics Institute of Technology excels in providing a fine academic experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
