London School of Commerce - LSC vs Australian College of Business and Technology - acbt vs International College of Business and Technology - ICBT vs Sri Lanka Institute of Tourism and Hotel Management vs University of Sri Jayewardenepura
Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
Nothing to show
- +Excellent, dedicated lecturers and advanced teaching techniques
- +Diverse course offerings and well-equipped facilities
- +Positive student life and overall supportive campus environment
Nothing to show
- +High quality management and commerce programs
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Valuable practical skills and efficient course delivery
- +Practical courses and knowledgeable, helpful lecturers
- +Good campus facilities and opportunities for growth
- +Strong academic reputation and graduate placements
- +Highly reputable accounting and finance qualification
- +Strong parliamentary backing and recognition
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support staff create a challenging environment.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a perceived lack of support are recurring complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion and dissatisfaction.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks across the board. Notably, professors, student life, and value are exceptionally strong areas, each earning a rating of 4.625. Internationality and location also score well at 4.25 and 4.375, respectively. The weakest area, though still solid, is facilities, rated at 4.0.
Nothing to show
Academic and student experience aspects of this university are highly rated. Professors, location, student life, and perceived value all achieve strong scores around 4.33. Facilities also perform well with a rating of 4. The university's accommodation and internationality are its comparatively weaker areas, both scoring 3.83. Overall, the institution demonstrates a positive student experience and academic offering.
Outstanding performance is evident in the university's facilities, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors and value also received very strong marks. Student life and location are rated favorably, with internationality also proving to be a positive aspect. However, accommodation presents a notable area for improvement, with a significantly lower rating compared to other metrics.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional performance. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently strong offering with no discernible weak areas. The university excels uniformly, providing an outstanding experience for its students.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent lecturers and flexible class timings, alongside well-equipped labs and facilities. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~67% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the university's high-quality education and the excellent Management and Commerce faculty. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 8 reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical courses, helpful lecturers, and good internship opportunities. Minor administrative slowness was noted once.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. This single review highlights it as the best accounting and finance knowledge provider in Sri Lanka.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am a student of Bsc (Hons) Nursing 07th batch (Galle branch). I recommend ICBT Galle branch to start Nursing Bsc and this is the best place for it. They have very excellent lecturers and progress is also very consistent. I really appreciate the dedication of previous Coordinator Miss Kanchana Panditha (presently Miss Kanchana Panditha-Assistant Manager-Academic Administration). Undergraduate Department, ICBT Colombo Camp) . All the best
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
