London School of Commerce - LSC vs Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University - HSTU vs Bangladesh University of Business and Technology vs Bangladesh University of Textiles vs Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University - SAU

Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/5 categories
Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University - HSTU: wins 0/5 categories
Bangladesh University of Business and Technology: wins 0/5 categories
Bangladesh University of Textiles: wins 1/5 categories
Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University - SAU: wins 4/5 categories
Bangladesh University of Health Sciences: wins 0/5 categories
Notre Dame University Bangladesh: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Textile Technology
Best programme: Veterinary Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.75
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.75
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong practical foundation from labs and coursework
  • +Renowned textile education in the sub-continent
  • +Specialized agricultural and veterinary programs.
  • +Strong academic foundation and research opportunities.
  • +Renowned as Bangladesh's oldest agricultural institution.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates uncertainty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent concerns.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its professors and location, both scoring 4.5 and 5 respectively. Student life and facilities also perform well, earning a solid 4. Accommodations and internationality are areas with room for improvement, indicated by ratings of 3.5. Overall, the university offers a good value for students, with a rating of 4.

This institution garners significant praise, particularly excelling in its prime **location** and vibrant **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. Offering excellent **value** also stands out. While generally strong, the **facilities**, **professors**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are rated slightly lower at a commendable four out of five, indicating solid but not perfect performance in these areas.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, feedback indicates a highly positive experience, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight strong foundational learning and excellent lab facilities, particularly for textile engineering.

This university receives excellent feedback, with 100% positive reviews. Students highlight its status as an old agricultural institution and its four faculties offering various degrees. The average rating is 4/5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close