London School of Commerce - LSC vs Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University - HSTU vs Eastern University Bangladesh vs Military Institute of Science and Technology vs Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University - SAU

Side-by-side comparison from 6 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/5 categories
Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University - HSTU: wins 0/5 categories
Eastern University Bangladesh: wins 0/5 categories
Military Institute of Science and Technology: wins 1/5 categories
Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University - SAU: wins 4/5 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Aeronautical Engineering
Best programme: Veterinary Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
4.75
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Win
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Win
Student life
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
2.75
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +strong academics and excellent labs
  • +well-structured curriculum for theory and practice
  • +no session jams, timely graduation
  • +Specialized agricultural and veterinary programs.
  • +Strong academic foundation and research opportunities.
  • +Renowned as Bangladesh's oldest agricultural institution.
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and uninspired course content are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent concerns.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its **location** and **accommodation**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities** and **student life** also score well, indicating a supportive and well-equipped campus environment. However, **professors**, **internationality**, and **value** received average ratings, suggesting potential areas for development compared to its other strengths.

This institution garners significant praise, particularly excelling in its prime **location** and vibrant **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. Offering excellent **value** also stands out. While generally strong, the **facilities**, **professors**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are rated slightly lower at a commendable four out of five, indicating solid but not perfect performance in these areas.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 from one review, the Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST) is praised for its strong academic environment and excellent lab facilities. Students appreciate the well-structured curriculum and the absence of session jams, allowing for timely graduation.

This university receives excellent feedback, with 100% positive reviews. Students highlight its status as an old agricultural institution and its four faculties offering various degrees. The average rating is 4/5.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
0%
0%
100%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close