London School of Commerce - LSC vs Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University - HSTU vs University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh - ULAB vs Royal University Of Dhaka vs Stamford University Bangladesh

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/6 categories
Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University - HSTU: wins 0/6 categories
University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh - ULAB: wins 0/6 categories
Royal University Of Dhaka: wins 0/6 categories
Stamford University Bangladesh: wins 6/6 categories
Atish Dipankar University of Science and Technology: wins 0/6 categories
State University of Bangladesh: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: BBA Human Resource Management
Best programme: BSc Pharmacy
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Professors
3.25
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Student life
3.75
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
2.75
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent faculty guidance and academic support
  • +Vibrant campus life and extracurricular opportunities
  • +Strong career preparation and industry connections

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality and skilled graduates
  • +Qualified and experienced faculty
  • +Vibrant student environment
  • +Structured curriculum and foundational knowledge
  • +Supportive faculty and guidance
  • +Personal and academic growth opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment that hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of support and resources for students, leading to academic struggles.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Unsupportive and ineffective teaching staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly for its **internationality (5)** and strong showings in **professors (4.5)** and **value (4.5)**. Facilities, student life, and location all received solid marks of 4. Areas requiring attention include **accommodation**, which scored a comparatively low 2.5. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, with its global reach and academic quality standing out significantly.

Nothing to show

Exceptional evaluations were received across all assessed areas. Strengths are evident in every aspect, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No weak areas were identified, indicating a consistently high standard in all surveyed categories.

Across all assessed categories, this institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent and high level of quality. Its strengths are evident in uniformly excellent ratings for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, each scoring a solid 4 out of 5. No single area stands out as significantly weaker than the others, indicating a well-rounded and satisfactory experience for its students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise excellent faculty guidance and a supportive environment for both academic and extracurricular pursuits.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights academic quality and a vibrant student environment. No negative feedback was reported.

The two reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a meaningful academic journey, strong theoretical foundations in core pharmacy subjects, and supportive faculty.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
50%
0%
100%
100%
0%
4★
25%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close