London School of Commerce - LSC vs Tamirul Millat Kamil Madrasah vs Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology - BUET vs Holy Family Red Crescent Medical College - HFRCMC vs Stamford University Bangladesh

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/4 categories
Tamirul Millat Kamil Madrasah: wins 0/4 categories
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology - BUET: wins 0/4 categories
Holy Family Red Crescent Medical College - HFRCMC: wins 0/4 categories
Stamford University Bangladesh: wins 4/4 categories
Bhawal Badre Alam Government College: wins 0/4 categories
International University of Business Agriculture and Technology - IUBAT: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Mechanical Engineering with Aerospace
Best programme: BBA Human Resource Management
Best programme: Bachelor in Electrical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.75
Not rated
4.75
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
3.25
Not rated
4.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Student life
3.75
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
2.75
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Inspiring academic atmosphere and environment
  • +High quality education and challenging curriculum
  • +Talented and hardworking peers

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality and skilled graduates
  • +Qualified and experienced faculty
  • +Vibrant student environment

Nothing to show

  • +Pioneering, visionary institution
  • +Commitment to producing professional graduates
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and learning resources.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Unsupportive and ineffective teaching staff.

Nothing to show

  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are significant concerns.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

With overwhelmingly positive feedback, the university excels in its **professors** and **location**, both earning a near-perfect 4.75. **Facilities** and **student life** also received high marks at 4.5. The areas for potential improvement, however, are **accommodation** and **internationality**, which scored 3.75. Overall, the university offers strong value at 4.5.

Nothing to show

Exceptional evaluations were received across all assessed areas. Strengths are evident in every aspect, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No weak areas were identified, indicating a consistently high standard in all surveyed categories.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. **Student Life** also received a top rating of 5. The university demonstrates a strong commitment to **Internationality** and offers good **Value**, both rated at 4.5. Its **Professors** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded, each earning a 4, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

With a 4.75 average rating, reviews overwhelmingly praise BUET's motivating, disciplined, and safe campus environment. Students highlight excellent facilities, highly qualified professors, and inspiring academic atmosphere. One review suggested the university could enhance its efforts.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights academic quality and a vibrant student environment. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the university's pioneering role and its founding vision. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
75%
0%
100%
0%
100%
4★
25%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close