London School of Commerce - LSC vs RV University vs The Oxford College of Pharmacy vs ISBR Business School vs Kristu Jayanti College - KJC

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bengaluru City University (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/5 categories
RV University: wins 0/5 categories
The Oxford College of Pharmacy: wins 0/5 categories
ISBR Business School: wins 1/5 categories
Kristu Jayanti College - KJC: wins 0/5 categories
Bangalore University: wins 0/5 categories
Bengaluru City University: wins 4/5 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Bangalore, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Bangalore, India
3.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Master in Management
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Bangalore, India
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: International Hotel Management
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Social Work
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
4.00
4.00
5.00
2.50
5.00
Location
4.75
Not rated
5.00
4.50
3.50
3.50
5.00
Professors
3.25
Not rated
3.00
4.50
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
3.50
4.00
2.50
2.50
5.00
Win
Student life
3.75
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
4.50
3.00
4.00
Value
2.75
Not rated
3.50
4.00
4.50
2.50
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
4.50
4.00
3.00
1.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Beautiful and inspiring surroundings
  • +Strong community and engaging environment
  • +Excellent academic programs and facilities
  • +strong academics and professors
  • +engaging extracurriculars for portfolio building
  • +memorable campus life
  • +Supportive professors and high teaching standards
  • +Vibrant campus life with diverse activities and clubs
  • +Good infrastructure and facilities
  • +Top-notch education and academic quality
  • +Strong reputation and recognition
  • +Balance of theory and practical knowledge
  • +Real-world experience and skill development
  • +Enriching exposure and rich learning
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
  • -The administrative and management systems are often inefficient and unsupportive.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear and inconsistent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as uninspiring.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of responsiveness and poor communication from staff are a problem.
  • -Disappointing course structure with excessive theory and insufficient practical experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder learning and student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

An analysis of university ratings reveals a strong presence in several key areas. The institution excels in its **location**, receiving a perfect score. **Accommodations** are also highly regarded, closely followed by **facilities** and **student life**, all scoring well. Conversely, **professors** and **internationality** present opportunities for improvement, with these aspects receiving moderate scores. The **value** proposition also falls into a similar moderate range.

Overall, this institution garners positive feedback, with its vibrant **Student Life** standing out as its strongest asset. **Professors** and **Location** also receive excellent marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** and **Facilities**, which, while solid, are rated slightly lower than other aspects. The university demonstrates a good international presence and offers good value.

This institution excels in its facilities and student life, both receiving high marks of 5 and 4.5 respectively. Its value for money is also rated very positively at 4.5. However, its internationality is a notable area for improvement, scoring a lower 2.5, and accommodation also received a moderate rating of 3. Professors and location are rated solidly in the mid-range.

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. Location and student life stand out positively, achieving moderate scores. However, accommodation is a significant weakness, receiving a very low rating. Facilities, professors, internationality, and overall value also fall into the lower-mid range, suggesting areas for potential improvement.

Exceptional scores distinguish this institution, particularly in its outstanding **facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value**, all receiving a perfect five. The only area not reaching maximum is **student life**, which scored a strong four. Overall, the university presents a highly commendable academic and practical environment, with its academic offerings and resources standing out as particularly robust.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

With one positive review out of two, student feedback is approximately 50% positive. The positive feedback highlights good infrastructure. There is no negative feedback in the provided samples.

With a 3.5/5 average rating, the 2 reviews highlight strong academics and cherished campus life. Placements are a noted challenge. Negative feedback is minimal.

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight the excellent academic and personal development environment, supportive professors, vibrant campus life, and good infrastructure. There is no negative feedback.

University reviews are split, with one positive and one negative, averaging 3/5 stars. Approximately 50% of feedback is negative, citing poor course structure and lack of practical exposure in specific subjects.

With a single review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlights an enriching experience with a good balance of theory and practical knowledge, including valuable fieldwork placements.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
100%
4★
25%
0%
50%
50%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close