London School of Commerce - LSC vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs NEXT Academy vs UCSI University vs Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - UTM
Side-by-side comparison from 41 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Supportive academic advisors and practical, hands-on learning.
- +Vibrant campus life and extracurricular opportunities.
- +Strong academic reputation and exceptional faculty
- +Excellent campus facilities and environment
- +Industry collaborations and career opportunities
- +Prestigious global and local reputation
- +High-quality, practical learning experiences
- +Vibrant campus life with diverse activities
- +Supportive and expert faculty with strong industry relevance
- +Modern facilities and conducive learning environment
- +Valuable internships and vibrant student experience
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues plague the administration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained, impacting the learning environment.
- -Limited access to resources and support services hinders student success.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Excessive and inflexible penalties are a significant concern.
- -Unhelpful and rude staff exacerbate problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently mentioned.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment cause significant frustration.
- -A lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of timely and effective communication.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
- -Poor faculty engagement and support.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in practical aspects, with perfect scores for both **location** and **accommodation**. However, student life appears to be a significant weakness, receiving the lowest rating. Facilities and internationality are rated moderately, while professors are well-regarded. The overall value proposition of the university is a point of concern, indicated by a below-average score in that area.
This university garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its **location** (4.375) and **value** (4.333). **Facilities** and **professors** also receive commendable scores around 4.1. Areas for potential improvement include **student life**, which received the lowest rating at 3.875, though **accommodation** and **internationality** both score a solid 4.
A standout performer, the university excels particularly in its **Location** (4.8) and **Student Life** (4.5). **Professors** (4.2) and **Value** (4.2) also receive strong marks. The primary area for improvement lies with **Accomodation** (3.6), which is the lowest-rated category. **Facilities** (3.9) and **Internationality** (3.8) fall within a moderate range.
This institution garners its highest marks in Location, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors and Student Life also score very well, indicating satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality present the weakest points, with ratings suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Value fall in the middle, reflecting a generally positive but not outstanding performance.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is ~100% positive. Students praise the well-structured program and supportive academic advisors. A practical, hands-on approach to learning and a vibrant campus environment are highlighted.
Approximately 89% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, research, and supportive faculty. A small percentage (around 11%) of negative feedback criticizes slow administrative processes and unhelpful management.
With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% highlight the university's prestige, strong global and employer reputation, and diverse multicultural environment. There is minimal negative feedback.
The majority of reviews are positive, highlighting smooth enrollment, well-equipped facilities, and valuable internships. Students praise expert teachers and a vibrant campus life. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
In my opinion, UTM is one of the leading universities in Malaysia, especially for engineering and technology-related fields. What I like most is its strong academic reputation, research opportunities, and diverse international community. The university also maintains collaborations with industries, which can benefit students in terms of internships and future careers. One aspect that some students may find challenging is that administrative processes can occasionally be slow, and adapting to a large campus may take time for new students. However, these are relatively minor issues compared to the overall quality of education. Overall, I would recommend UTM to students who are looking for a reputable university with strong academic programs, research exposure, and an international learning environment. If you are applying to UTM yourself, I can also help you write more personalized answers based on your academic background.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
