London School of Commerce - LSC vs Nilai University vs NEXT Academy vs Kolej Poly-Tech MARA - KUPTM vs Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/4 categories
Nilai University: wins 0/4 categories
NEXT Academy: wins 0/4 categories
Kolej Poly-Tech MARA - KUPTM: wins 0/4 categories
Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology: wins 4/4 categories
National University of Malaysia: wins 0/4 categories
University Malaysia of Computer Science and Engineering - UNIMY: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3.70
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
Best programme: Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Engineering
Best programme: Digital Business Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Location
4.75
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
5.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.17
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Student life
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
4.17
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Value
2.75
Not rated
Not rated
3.83
5.00
4.00
5.00
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and expert faculty with strong industry relevance
  • +Modern facilities and conducive learning environment
  • +Valuable internships and vibrant student experience
  • +Career-ready, practical, and industry-focused programmes
  • +Supportive lecturers and valuable real-world project experience
  • +Rewarding holistic student experience
  • +Supportive supervisors and academic environment
  • +Ample research opportunities and facilities
  • +Supportive lecturers and friendly environment
  • +Practical, industry-focused programs
  • +Guidance and opportunities for development
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of timely and effective communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Poor faculty engagement and support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency creates uncertainty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to dissatisfaction with learning outcomes.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners its highest marks in Location, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors and Student Life also score very well, indicating satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality present the weakest points, with ratings suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Value fall in the middle, reflecting a generally positive but not outstanding performance.

This institution garners exceptional scores across the board, achieving a perfect 5 out of 5 in every surveyed category. This suggests outstanding performance in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. With no discernible weak areas, the university presents a consistently strong offering to its students.

This university excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its professors and location. Student life and internationality are also strong, with ratings of 4. While facilities and value are well-regarded at 4, the accommodation rating stands out as a significant weakness at 0.

This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in the areas of professors and location, both receiving a perfect 5. Facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality are also well-regarded with solid scores of 4. The university also achieves a perfect 5 for its value proposition.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The majority of reviews are positive, highlighting smooth enrollment, well-equipped facilities, and valuable internships. Students praise expert teachers and a vibrant campus life. No negative feedback was reported.

This university garners highly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise practical, industry-focused courses, supportive lecturers, and valuable real-world project experiences that enhance career readiness.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This indicates overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of comments highlighting strong research opportunities and a supportive academic environment. No negative feedback was received.

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive, giving UNIMY a 5/5 rating. This student highlighted supportive lecturers and a friendly, practical learning environment.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
4★
25%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close