Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB (5.00)
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 1/4 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 2/4 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 1/4 categories
Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN: wins 0/4 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/4 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Management
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: Graphic Engineering and Design
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
3.67
4.00
4.00
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive environment & student well-being
  • +Academic focus & professional growth
  • +Welcoming campus & convenient location
  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities

Nothing to show

  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution receives notable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** also present solid performance, averaging a 4.0. The university's **Student Life** is rated moderately well at 3.67, while **Internationality** stands as its weakest area with a score of 3.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

Nothing to show

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With 3.8/5 stars from 5 reviews, ~60% are positive, praising a cozy, well-located environment supporting professional growth and well-being. Academics are prioritized. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
20%
0%
100%
0%
33%
0%
4★
0%
40%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
40%
50%
0%
100%
67%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close