Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC vs Centro Colombo Americano vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC
Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent faculty and academic level
- +Relevant and practical learning experiences
- +Attractive and accessible campus locations
- +Supportive environment & student well-being
- +Academic focus & professional growth
- +Welcoming campus & convenient location
- +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
- +Excellent preparation for the labor market
- +University prestige and history
Nothing to show
- +Strong social and community focus
- +Early patient contact and practical skill development
- +Student voice and equitable treatment
- +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
- +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
- +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
- -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.
Nothing to show
This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.
This institution receives notable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** also present solid performance, averaging a 4.0. The university's **Student Life** is rated moderately well at 3.67, while **Internationality** stands as its weakest area with a score of 3.
Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.
Nothing to show
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.
With 3.8/5 stars from 5 reviews, ~60% are positive, praising a cozy, well-located environment supporting professional growth and well-being. Academics are prioritized. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
