Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO (5.00)
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 0/4 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 2/4 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 0/4 categories
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz: wins 2/4 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 0/4 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/4 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.50
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.50
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
2.00
5.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.50
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
  • +Practical, relevant assignments and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Strong psychology program.
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
40%
67%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
60%
33%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close