Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Centro Colombo Americano vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO (4.90)
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 0/6 categories
Centro Colombo Americano: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 2/6 categories
Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES: wins 0/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: General Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.38
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.50
4.63
Win
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.63
4.00
Not rated
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.13
3.00
Not rated
3.88
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.75
Win
3.67
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.50
4.00
Not rated
4.63
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.63
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations
  • +High-quality faculty and engaging teaching methods
  • +Strong curriculum and diverse, recognized programs
  • +Efficient support services and professional growth opportunities
  • +Supportive environment & student well-being
  • +Academic focus & professional growth
  • +Welcoming campus & convenient location

Nothing to show

  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment
  • +Professional development & industry relevance
  • +Life projects & research opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and equipment are consistently outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Instructors' teaching quality and availability are often insufficient.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

Across multiple aspects, this institution receives commendations. Student life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest rating. The university also performs exceptionally well in professors, location, and accommodation. On the other hand, its weakest area is internationality, which, while still solid, is rated lower than other categories. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a particularly strong showing in student engagement and academic resources.

This institution receives notable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** also present solid performance, averaging a 4.0. The university's **Student Life** is rated moderately well at 3.67, while **Internationality** stands as its weakest area with a score of 3.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received uniform ratings. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent scoring suggests an even distribution of perceived quality across these key aspects of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

With an average rating of 4.88/5 from 8 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and transformative learning experiences. No negative feedback was reported.

With 3.8/5 stars from 5 reviews, ~60% are positive, praising a cozy, well-located environment supporting professional growth and well-being. Academics are prioritized. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's professional development and real-world opportunities. One reviewer suggested incorporating more training on modern technologies like Azure and Big Data.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
40%
88%
20%
0%
56%
0%
0%
4★
60%
13%
40%
0%
44%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close