Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO (5.00)
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 0/4 categories
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/4 categories
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 2/4 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 1/4 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 1/4 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
4.60
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.50
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
4.63
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
3.88
5.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
4.20
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.17
Not rated
4.63
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors

Nothing to show

  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

Nothing to show

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

Nothing to show

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
40%
0%
86%
0%
56%
100%
0%
4★
60%
0%
14%
0%
44%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close