Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Valencia College vs Qassim University vs King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals vs Moscow State Technological University Stankin - STANKIN

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Augusto Motta University Centre - UNSUAM (5.00)
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 2/7 categories
Valencia College: wins 0/7 categories
Qassim University: wins 0/7 categories
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals: wins 1/7 categories
Moscow State Technological University Stankin - STANKIN: wins 0/7 categories
Arab Open University: wins 1/7 categories
Augusto Motta University Centre - UNSUAM: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Orlando, Florida, United States
4.80
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Media
Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: petroleum refining and Petrochemical engineering
Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Best programme: Criminology and Law
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.33
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.40
5.00
Win
Location
4.50
Win
4.40
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Professors
4.00
4.25
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.80
5.00
Win
Internationality
5.00
Win
3.88
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.40
2.00
Student life
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.40
Win
4.00
Value
4.00
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.40
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.00
3.71
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations
  • +Accessible admissions and flexible program transfers
  • +Supportive and interactive faculty and staff
  • +Valuable resources and guidance for academic success

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent engineering programs and facilities
  • +Supportive administration and alumni network
  • +Good professors and grading practices

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible study programs balancing personal and professional life
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors with real-world focus
  • +Diverse student body and engaging university activities
  • +Excellent teaching and well-structured programs.
  • +Abundant student amenities and resources like the library.
  • +Supportive environment and helpful staff.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause frustration.
  • -Disorganized curriculum and unclear academic expectations lead to confusion.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects are common concerns.
  • -administrative and management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of adequate resources and support
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

Considering university ratings, the institution excels in **Location** and **Value**, both receiving scores above 4.4. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also demonstrate strong performance. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the lowest score at 3.71, with **Internationality** also falling below a 4.0. Overall, the university offers a positive experience, particularly regarding its environment and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its accommodations and international student experience, both receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and professors are also well-regarded, scoring 4. Student life and value are solid at 3 and 4 respectively. The primary area for improvement lies in its location, which received the lowest score of 2.5.

Nothing to show

Academic excellence shines through with professors receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also well-regarded, alongside internationality and value for money. Location and accommodation, while still positive, represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still solid, scores. This indicates a generally strong offering with particular strengths in teaching quality.

This university garners top marks for its facilities, professors, and perceived value, all receiving perfect scores. Student life and location are also considered strong points, rated at a solid 4. However, the university struggles significantly in the accommodation category, scoring a zero, and its internationality is rated low at 2.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise program variety, knowledgeable and interactive professors, and helpful staff. ~100% of feedback is positive.

Nothing to show

With one positive review, students highlight good engineering programs, labs, and infrastructure. The average rating is 3.5/5 stars, with ~50% positive sentiment. Campus life was noted as a bit boring.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students highlight program flexibility and supportive professors. Some minor points mention less active student activities and occasional exam concerns.

This university has a single positive review, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights great teachers, ample student amenities, and a well-structured program with diverse learning activities. A well-stocked library and helpful librarians were also praised.

Rating distribution
5★
40%
75%
0%
0%
0%
60%
100%
4★
60%
25%
0%
50%
0%
20%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
20%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close