Jain University vs Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences vs PES University vs Alliance University vs Acharya Institute of Technology - AIT

Side-by-side comparison from 17 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Jain University: wins 1/3 categories
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences: wins 0/3 categories
PES University: wins 0/3 categories
Alliance University: wins 0/3 categories
Acharya Institute of Technology - AIT: wins 0/3 categories
University of Visvesvaraya College of Engineering - UVCE: wins 2/3 categories
Dr. B R Ambedkar School of Economics University: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Bengaluru, India
4.80
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Dental Public Health
Bengaluru, India
5.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration and Information Systems Management
Bengaluru, India
3.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.67
4.67
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.63
4.67
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.44
5.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.11
Win
3.67
3.33
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.50
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.11
4.33
4.33
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.38
4.33
4.33
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Vibrant campus environment and facilities.
  • +Comprehensive academic programs and skill development.
  • +Dedicated faculty and supportive learning environment
  • +Well-structured curriculum with practical application
  • +Accessible exam patterns for scoring
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent infrastructure and student-oriented programs
  • +Valuable industry exposure and extracurricular opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality engineering programs and supportive faculty
  • +Opportunities for career advancement and student success

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are a recurring complaint.
  • -A lack of responsiveness and transparency from staff is deeply unappreciated.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of responsiveness and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with its strongest areas being Location (4.63) and Student Life (4.5). Professors also received high marks (4.44). Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area with a rating of 3.38. Internationality and Value were both rated similarly at 4.11, indicating moderate satisfaction in these aspects.

Overall, this institution garners impressive scores in several key areas. Professors and student life both achieve a perfect 5.0 rating, indicating exceptional quality. Facilities and location are also highly rated at 4.67. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, which stands at 3.67, making it the lowest-scoring category. Accommodations and value are rated solidly at 4.33.

This institution receives exceptional marks for its **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring a perfect 5. **Facilities** are also highly rated at 4.67. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.33. **Accomodation** and **Value** are rated at 4.33, while **Professors** earned a respectable 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Consistently high scores characterize this institution's offerings, particularly in its facilities, professors, location, and student life, all achieving a perfect five. Value for money also garnered a top rating. The accommodation experience, however, presents a weaker point with a score of three. Internationality is rated well at four, suggesting a generally positive but improvable global outlook.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students praising the vibrant campus, knowledgeable faculty, and good exposure through events. Some note fee structure is expensive but worthwhile.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students highlight rewarding experiences, supportive learning environments, and well-structured curricula. Dedicated faculty and excellent facilities are also frequently praised.

All three reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Recurring themes include strong academics, knowledgeable faculty, excellent infrastructure, and ample student-oriented programs and events. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university has a single review, rating it 5/5 stars. The positive feedback highlights excellent engineering programs, supportive teaching staff, and recent campus renovations. There were no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
78%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close