Lebanese University vs Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth - USJ vs Lebanese American University - LAU vs American University of Science and Technology - AUST vs Lebanese International University - LIU
Side-by-side comparison from 55 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality education and highly qualified teachers
- +Enriched social and cultural experiences
- +Affordable tuition fees
- +High-quality education and excellent teachers
- +Well-equipped facilities and organized programs
- +Strong reputation and career prospects
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Diverse student community and collaborative environment
- +Strong academic foundation and practical learning opportunities
- +Supportive and caring faculty
- +Comprehensive and diverse course offerings
- +Positive and friendly learning environment
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable instructors.
- +Affordable education and diverse programs.
- +Supportive and family-like university environment.
- +Excellent academic programs and faculty support
- +Supportive and accessible campus environment
- +Career preparation and guidance
- +academic excellence & dedicated faculty
- +vibrant learning environment & community engagement
- +promotion of cultural awareness & critical thinking
- -Academic rigor and workload are overwhelming and poorly managed.
- -Poor quality of teaching across multiple subjects.
- -Administrative and management issues, including perceived dishonesty and unhelpfulness.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently mentioned.
- -Lack of resources and support are significant concerns.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Negative feedback points to unsupportive or ineffective teaching.
- -Financial prioritization over education and weak global recognition of certificates.
- -Unpleasant study environment and lack of freedom to express opinions.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of maintenance.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum.
- -Poor administrative support and communication.
- -Overcrowded classes and limited resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible academic policies and unresponsive administrative staff cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern technology detract from the educational experience.
Across various aspects, this institution garners solid reviews, with professors and value for money standing out as significant strengths. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting an area that could benefit from improvement. Student life and facilities also registered moderately, while location and internationality received mid-range ratings.
The university presents a mixed profile, with its strongest rating in **Location** at 4. Areas of good performance include **Professors** and **Accomodation**, both scoring 3.67. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest rating at 3.0. Facilities, Internationality, and Value all fall in the mid-range with scores around 3.33.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, receiving a high rating of 4.58. Location and facilities also scored well, both above 4.3. Conversely, internationality and accommodation appear to be areas for potential improvement, with scores of 3.5 and 3.92 respectively. The university's value for money and professor quality are rated moderately.
This institution excels notably in its teaching quality, boasting a perfect score for professors, and also earns high marks for its vibrant student life, international presence, and desirable location. The value proposition is also exceptionally strong. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the areas with the lowest ratings, indicating room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its location, which received the highest rating. Facilities and accommodation also scored highly, reflecting positive student experiences in these areas. Conversely, internationality emerged as the weakest point, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement or diversity. Student life and value for money present a mixed, but generally favorable, picture.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded profile, with student life receiving the highest possible score of 5.0. Facilities and accommodation also stand out with excellent ratings of 4.75. Conversely, internationality is the weakest area, scoring 4.25, though still a strong performance. Professors, location, and value all achieve a solid 4.5.
This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect rating for its **location** and strong marks for **value** and **professors**. While student life and facilities are also well-regarded, the **accommodation** rating stands as the weakest aspect, suggesting potential for improvement in that specific domain. Overall, the university presents a compelling proposition, particularly for those prioritizing accessibility and affordability.
With a 3.79/5 average, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, quality education, and affordability. A small portion (~7%) of feedback mentions challenges like high credit loads and inconsistent teaching quality.
University reviews are mostly positive, with 2 out of 3 (about 67%) giving high ratings. Students praised the high level of education and well-equipped facilities. One review (about 33%) expressed dissatisfaction, citing concerns about the university's focus on money over students and inconsistent support.
Approximately 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging courses, supportive faculty, and academic excellence. Some mention slow bureaucracy and chaotic registration as minor issues.
All four reviews are highly positive, averaging 4.75/5 stars. Recurring themes highlight a dynamic, supportive learning environment, excellent and caring faculty, and a unique, friendly student life. No negative feedback was provided.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable and supportive instructors, as well as a positive learning environment. A small portion (~6%) of negative feedback mentions concerns about finances and the value of certificates.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise academic excellence, helpful faculty, and a supportive learning environment. There are no reported negative reviews.
With one review, the average rating is a perfect 5/5. This sole feedback is highly favorable, appreciating academic excellence, diversity, and a vibrant learning environment.
the study program is heavy and international ! degree recognized worldwide! logistically it is conquered by politics. too many strikes from the Dr. due to financial issue and bad salaries. Faculties not well equipped due to bad management.
I spent 3 years at USJ in the faculty of pharmacy, school of medical analysis laboratory technicians (ETLAM). The school was well organized, the lessons very clear with excellent teachers and access to the university's laboratories, which were also well equipped. I recommend those who wish to work as clinical laboratory technicians to continue their studies at USJ. The lessons are given in French, but we also had English lessons to improve our skills in this language. Student life at USJ is friendly, that said, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that the timetable is decided beforehand, the student cannot choose his own schedule as in other universities in Lebanon.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show