Queen Mary University of London - QMUL vs Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla - BUAP vs WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management vs Damascus University - DU vs Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology - HIAST
Side-by-side comparison from 243 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Clear information and good academic structure
- +Highly qualified and encouraging professors
- +Positive and engaging atmosphere with motivated peers
- +Excellent academic programs and international opportunities
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning experiences
- +International exposure and real-world business cases
- +Engaging program with opportunities for skill development and creativity
- +Strong academic programs and dedicated faculty
- +Modern learning environment and updated materials
- +Opportunities for student growth and development
- +Prestigious, rigorous applied sciences and engineering education
- +High-quality graduates well-prepared for careers
- +Specialized focus on telecommunications, microwave, and RF engineering
- +Flexible learning structure and accessible support
- +High-quality teaching with engaging instructors
- +Practical skill development and excellent resources
- +Flexible online lectures and self-paced learning
- +Affordability and recognized accreditation
- +Online program and remote learning access
- -Lack of course support and practical industry preparation.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues regarding modules and projects.
- -Disruptions from strikes and lack of compensation for missed learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and unengaging curriculum are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is problematic.
- -Unresponsive or unhelpful administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are prevalent complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and staff are frequent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Overcrowding and limited access to essential services cause considerable dissatisfaction.
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, boasting a high rating. The university also performs well in Facilities and Student Life. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, which received lower scores compared to other categories.
Performance across key university aspects reveals a mixed but largely positive picture. Location emerges as the strongest area, closely followed by Value and Student Life. Facilities and Professors also receive strong scores. Internationality is rated well, while Accomodation stands out as the weakest, indicating room for improvement in that specific category.
Overall, this university garners very positive feedback. Its strongest aspects include excellent Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring a high 4.5. Value is also rated highly at 4.5. Areas with slightly lower scores are Student Life and Internationality, both at 3.5. Accommodations received a solid 4.
This institution exhibits a strong standing, particularly in its **Location** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Conversely, **Student Life** is rated as the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in that domain. Other aspects like Facilities, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate range.
This institution shines brightest in **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accommodation** are also strong points, earning solid 4s. However, **Location** is a significant weakness, with a score of 0, and **Value** sits at a moderate 3, indicating areas for improvement.
This institution boasts exceptional marks across its offerings. Facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value all received perfect scores of 5. Professors and internationality were also highly rated, narrowly missing a perfect score at 4.91. The university excels in providing a well-rounded and positive experience for its students, with only minor areas for slight improvement.
This institution excels in its facilities, receiving a perfect score. Location is another strong point, rated highly at 4.67. Student life, however, is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Accommodations and value for money are also well-regarded, both at 4.33. Ratings for professors and internationality are moderate, around 3.67.
~77% of 208 reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, welcoming environments, and good opportunities. Minimal negative feedback, ~2%, notes limited support and communication issues.
Students highly praise this university, with ~83% giving positive feedback. Recurring themes include qualified professors, a positive atmosphere, and good academic programs with international exchange opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight experienced professors, a strong mix of theory and practical application, and enjoyable staff and fellow students.
With a 4.17 average rating from 6 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~83%). Students praise academic programs, faculty, modern facilities, and growth opportunities. A few mentioned slightly outdated instruments or large class sizes.
With a single review, this university has a 4/5 average rating. The sole feedback was positive, highlighting a prestigious education and rigorous assessment that prepares graduates well for careers.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.82/5. Students praise flexible learning, excellent lecturers, and adequate resources.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students praise flexibility in scheduling, affordability, and the convenience of online lectures. Some mention a desire for fully remote exams.
While the first year was full of compulsory modules and slightly overwhelming, I have really enjoyed the last two years. They have allowed me to explore what I am genuinely interested in (specifically human rights) by offering such a wide range of modules. This is what I have enjoyed most out of the course. There was a long directory of modules to choose from in the last two years, all with different types of assignments (either entirely exam-based, entirely coursework or a mixture of the two). As I picked mostly human-rights based modules and such, I have realised that I want to work in this field too, and am also preparing to apply to a masters in this field within the next two years. However, some of the module assignments changed after registration in the third year, and this caused some problems in the last semester when students tried to change modules, as each module change is done manually in the Politics department. I know that some students, including myself, were unhappy with this experience when modules filled up too quickly. Student support has been amazing. Lecturers and professors have been very helpful with assignment-support. The help has ranged from office hours to telephone calls and emails. In my second and third year, I have found this particularly helpful in pushing my grade higher as lecturers are always open to looking over essay and assignment plans and offering helpful advice. One small problem that I encountered with this in the third year was that marking criteria was inconsistent with some modules and lecturers. However, this was only limited to one or two modules, and overall, I was happy with my experience. Career support is also very good. I only started using the resources available from the careers office this year, but it has been a good experience. Meetings are available every week and I have used them to get my cover letter checked as well as having a mock interview for an internship. This really helped me to prepare for possible questions as it was my first interview. I would definitely recommend this course and university to a friend. I have enjoyed my time and know what I want to do in the future career-wise.
Nothing to show
Amazing program, it provides the perfect blend and opportunity to learn skills and also explore your creativity. Most professors are very experienced and well known within their field of expertise. Some are outstanding and provide you with great knowledge. There is a lot of emphases given to practical learning and group projects. WHU staff, as well as students, were good fun.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
