Mary Immaculate College - MIC vs University College Cork - UCC vs University of Limerick - UL vs Institute of Technology Carlow - IT Carlow vs ONCAMPUS Global

Side-by-side comparison from 164 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
Mary Immaculate College - MIC: wins 1/6 categories
University College Cork - UCC: wins 0/6 categories
University of Limerick - UL: wins 0/6 categories
Institute of Technology Carlow - IT Carlow: wins 3/6 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 2/6 categories
Royal College of Physicians of Ireland: wins 0/6 categories
Southeast Technological University - SETU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Secondary Education
Best programme: Arts
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Bachelor of Media and Communication/Cybersecurity
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: Health Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
2.00
3.91
4.21
4.67
Win
4.44
Not rated
3.33
Location
2.00
4.09
4.01
4.33
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.33
Professors
5.00
4.05
4.28
4.33
4.76
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
1.00
3.72
4.21
4.67
Win
4.62
Not rated
4.00
Student life
2.00
4.19
4.23
4.33
4.58
Win
Not rated
2.50
Value
5.00
Win
4.21
4.32
4.33
4.52
Not rated
3.33
Accommodation
3.00
3.43
3.94
4.67
Win
4.35
Not rated
2.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Close-knit community and personal lecturer relationships
  • +Strong sense of togetherness and unity among students
  • +Excellent teaching programs and student support
  • +High-quality programs and academic excellence
  • +Supportive faculty and enriching research opportunities
  • +Vibrant campus life and diverse extracurricular activities
  • +Practical skills and career preparation
  • +Supportive and friendly academic staff and community
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive staff and organized, well-structured programs.
  • +Excellent library resources for study and research.
  • +Handy campus facilities like a gym and practical classrooms.
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and dedicated staff
  • +Affordable tuition for international students
  • +Good campus facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Ineffective teaching and lack of support.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of career guidance and irrelevant research suggestions from faculty.
  • -Poor quality of education and facilities not worth the cost.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Course content and teaching methods often fail to meet expectations.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support staff are significant concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shows a stark contrast in its ratings. It excels significantly in **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **Internationality** is a clear weak point, scoring only one. Facilities, Location, and Student Life also received low marks, indicating areas for considerable improvement. Accommodations sit in the middle with a moderate rating.

Overall, this institution receives favorable reviews, with its strongest areas being **Value** and **Student Life**, both exceeding 4.1. **Location** also scores well. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, which falls below 3.5. Other categories, including **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Facilities**, generally fall within the mid-to-high 3s and low 4s.

Analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive reception. The strongest area is **Value** (4.32), closely followed by **Professors** (4.28) and **Student Life** (4.23). **Accommodations** stand out as the weakest point, receiving the lowest rating at 3.94. Other categories like Facilities and Internationality also scored well above average.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its **Facilities**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality**, all scoring a near-perfect 4.7. While still very strong, the areas of **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are slightly lower, each averaging 4.3. Overall, the university demonstrates excellence, particularly in its physical and global aspects.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

Nothing to show

This institution receives its highest marks for its **Professors**, with a perfect score, and a strong showing for **Location**. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Accomodation** present the most significant areas for improvement, both scoring below average. **Facilities** and **Value** are rated moderately, while **Internationality** also garners a solid evaluation.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting a strong sense of community, close lecturer-student relationships, and excellent teaching. Some mention the college's compact size and limited on-site facilities.

Nearly all (approximately 100%) of the 51 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.12/5. Students highlight academic excellence, strong research, and faculty expertise. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.24/5, approximately 99% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, practical skills, and a vibrant learning atmosphere. A single negative review mentioned concerns about career prospects and faculty motivation.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight well-organized programs, helpful staff, and good campus facilities like the library and gym.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from three reviews, student feedback is highly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight supportive and dedicated lecturers, along with an affordable environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
27%
28%
33%
76%
0%
0%
4★
50%
57%
71%
67%
24%
0%
100%
3★
25%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Academic brilliance

My time as a student at University College Cork (UCC) has been truly transformative. UCC's unwavering commitment to academic brilliance, alongside its lively campus life, has made my experience here unforgettable.

University Life in Limerick

I am currently studying a Masters in International Entrepreneurship Management this programme develops entrepreneurial creativity, awareness and specialist knowledge to help establish, manage and grow innovative new ventures across a variety of industry settings, incorporating a range of in-company projects to give ‘real world’ experience. Participants explore their own entrepreneurial potential and prepare an investor-ready business plan. I have always wanted to start my own business and this programme equipped me with the tools and skills to do this. Throughout the programme, we were able to work with real-life businesses and consult for them on a regular basis. For example in a module called international business consulting we worked for one of the biggest PPE distributors in the EU. We developed a market entry strategy for the company Irema and outlined how they could advance into the US market. Furthermore, for the final year project, we had to work with a small enterprise and establish a two-year commercialisation plan for them. This was really great fun and gave a practical experience that you wouldn’t be able to get in any other programme.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close