Mary Immaculate College - MIC vs University of Limerick - UL vs Kemmy Business School - KBS vs UCD Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School vs Griffith College Ireland
Side-by-side comparison from 98 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Close-knit community and personal lecturer relationships
- +Strong sense of togetherness and unity among students
- +Excellent teaching programs and student support
- +Emphasis on practical, real-world skills and career preparation.
- +Welcoming atmosphere and strong sense of community for all students.
- +Excellent lecturers and dedicated academic support.
- +Expert faculty and supportive environment
- +Modern facilities and accommodation
- +International focus and diverse student body
- +High-quality teaching and supportive professors
- +Career development opportunities and industry preparation
- +Supportive guidance throughout the student journey
- +Practical, skill-focused education with industry-experienced professors
- +Affordable programs and welcoming community atmosphere
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Well-structured and accommodating courses
- +Welcoming and convenient campus environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Poor faculty engagement and guidance on career prospects and research.
- -Lack of quality and value despite seemingly lower fees.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication and transparency are lacking from leadership.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of essential university facilities and student support services
- -Poor teaching quality and insufficient practical application
- -Inadequate building maintenance and uncomfortable conditions
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Ineffective administrative and management practices cause frustration.
- -Lack of student support and career services is a significant concern.
This institution shows a stark contrast in its ratings. It excels significantly in **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **Internationality** is a clear weak point, scoring only one. Facilities, Location, and Student Life also received low marks, indicating areas for considerable improvement. Accommodations sit in the middle with a moderate rating.
Considerable strengths emerge in teaching quality and student experience, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.3 and Student Life at 4.23. The university also scores well in Facilities (4.2) and Internationality (4.21). Location is positively regarded at 4.01. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, scoring 3.95, while Value is also a strong point at 4.34.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates a consistent and strong performance. Each aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and internationality, has earned a rating of 4. The university excels uniformly, with no single area standing out significantly above others, nor any area identified as a weakness. Its balanced approach suggests a well-rounded educational experience.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Internationality and value for money receive particularly high marks, suggesting a welcoming global environment and excellent return on investment. Professors also earn strong ratings. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which scores lower than other aspects, indicating potential room for improvement in student housing offerings. Other categories like facilities, location, and student life are rated positively.
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly praised, with Professors and Internationality both receiving a strong 4.29 rating. Location also scores well at 4.17. The university's weakest area is Accomodation, which received a lower score of 2.88. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.
Nothing to show
This university presents a generally positive profile, with particularly strong ratings for its professors at 4.5. Other highly-rated aspects include facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality, all scoring a solid 4. The location is the weakest area, receiving a 3.5 rating, though overall value is also rated favorably at 4.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting a strong sense of community, close lecturer-student relationships, and excellent teaching. Some mention the college's compact size and limited on-site facilities.
With ~99% of 80 reviews being positive, students highlight a lively community, excellent facilities, and practical learning. A single negative review criticized career prospects and faculty awareness.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews praise the vibrant academic community, state-of-the-art amenities, and expert faculty. ~100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews recorded.
Four reviews all expressed positive experiences, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Recurring themes include a positive learning environment, helpful professors, and a strong emphasis on developing soft skills. There were no negative reviews.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive guidance, practical learning, and friendly staff. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions a lack of facilities and career support.
Nothing to show
With a 4.5/5 average rating, ~0% negative feedback indicates a highly positive student experience. Students praise the welcoming atmosphere, easy navigation of classes and campus, and friendly student-friendly location. Responsiveness of staff and well-structured courses are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
I am currently studying a Masters in International Entrepreneurship Management this programme develops entrepreneurial creativity, awareness and specialist knowledge to help establish, manage and grow innovative new ventures across a variety of industry settings, incorporating a range of in-company projects to give ‘real world’ experience. Participants explore their own entrepreneurial potential and prepare an investor-ready business plan. I have always wanted to start my own business and this programme equipped me with the tools and skills to do this. Throughout the programme, we were able to work with real-life businesses and consult for them on a regular basis. For example in a module called international business consulting we worked for one of the biggest PPE distributors in the EU. We developed a market entry strategy for the company Irema and outlined how they could advance into the US market. Furthermore, for the final year project, we had to work with a small enterprise and establish a two-year commercialisation plan for them. This was really great fun and gave a practical experience that you wouldn’t be able to get in any other programme.
Nothing to show
I overall liked the quality of education which includes projects, assignments and levels of exams. Furthermore, teachers are really nice and always willing to help students. However, one thing I would recommend is that electives should be introduced in this course as that would really help in giving a proper direction to one's career. Secondly, internships should also be included in the module as are really helpful in getting a job.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
