Pacific Lutheran University vs King Abdulaziz University - KAU vs ESSCA School of Management vs Indus University vs Óbuda University - OE
Side-by-side comparison from 45 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs and qualified faculty
- +Access to resources, practical applications, and research opportunities
- +Supportive teaching staff and good communication channels
- +International focus and diverse programs
- +Experiential learning and networking opportunities
- +Supportive professors and student community
- +Practical, real-world projects
- +Strong academic programs and teaching methods
- +Well-rounded experience with leadership opportunities
- +Practical and industry-relevant education
- +Supportive and helpful professors
- +Diverse international student body
- +Welcoming atmosphere and good facilities.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable instructors.
- +Qualified lecturers and guidance in career pursuit
- +Versatile skill development and opportunity for self-expression
- +High standard of learning and character molding
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum concerns are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -A lack of career support and poor internship opportunities are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor condition of buildings were a major concern.
- -Lack of organized support for international students was evident.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are often mentioned.
- -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching quality is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of sufficient seating and inadequate lab facilities.
- -Difficulty adapting to the learning system and early lectures.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both receiving a high score of 4.75. Areas like **Location** also performed very well at 4.5. While still strong, **Accomodation** is the comparatively lowest-rated category at 4.0, suggesting potential for improvement in this specific aspect. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positively reviewed environment.
The university demonstrates considerable strengths, notably in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both earning a high rating of 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also score very well at 4.33. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 2.83. **Facilities** are rated at 3.5, and **Location** at 3.67, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, particularly for its accommodations, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a near-perfect 4.5. Facilities, professors, and student life also score well with a 4. Facilities and professors also score well, with a rating of 4. Its weakest area is location, which received a 3.
Offering a mixed but generally positive assessment, this institution excels in **Accomodation**, receiving a high score of 4.2. Other strengths include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all rated at 3.8. The university's **Facilities** and **Student Life** are its weakest points, both scoring 3.2, while **Value** sits at a moderate 3.4.
Exceptional scores define this institution's core offerings, with perfect marks awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation. These areas represent its undeniable strengths. Conversely, its internationality receives a moderate rating, and its value proposition stands out as a significant weakness with a low score.
This institution garners its highest marks for value, closely followed by excellent ratings for its professors and student life. Conversely, the university's facilities and internationality received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, suggesting room for improvement in these areas. Accommodation and location also present a more moderate standing.
Nothing to show
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students highlight academic excellence, qualified faculty, and comprehensive programs. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% are positive, highlighting international focus, experiential learning, and networking. Some note demanding workloads.
Two reviews for Indus University show a consistently positive sentiment, averaging 4/5 stars. Students highlight the strong academic programs and effective teaching methods. There is no negative feedback.
With 3 out of 5 reviews being positive, students generally find the university offers practical training and helpful professors. Around 20% of feedback noted issues with course availability or administrative support.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with the single review giving it 4/5 stars. The positive review highlights a good atmosphere and buildings, with good teachers, though it notes a current lack of experienced technical staff for practical teaching.
The majority of students (~74%) praise qualified lecturers and high learning standards. A smaller portion (~11%) mentions issues like tight schedules or inadequate seating. The average rating is 3.89/5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
I was an Erasmus Student at this University(Banky faculty) in spring semester 19/20. It was the worst Erasmus ever. Only 4/9 subjects which I choose in my Learning Agreement existed in the Neptun system( which is compulsory for every student). So I had only 8/30 ECTS in the first week. Firstly, the coordinators answered my e-mails, but it wasn’t so useful, because they only said: “everything is good don’t mind we will fix it”. (If you try to choose another subject from the “subjects list for Erasmus student” (which is on official page) be ready, that 85% of subjects don’t exist in Neptun or don’t have any places for you. ) After 10000 e-mails with asking for help, they stopped responding to me. It was already the end of the second week of studying when I realize that nothing will change and I couldn’t reach the necessary 30ECTS. I had to return to my home Uni not to miss this semester. I don’t know who is responsible for this situation and I don’t wish anyone to be in my place. So... if you want to spoil your Erasmus, waste money, time and Nerves then go to Obuda University.
Nothing to show
My opinion about this University is this, it is a reputable and recommendable citadel of learning for all. My experience with the school is fair most times and rarely hectic. What stood out is actually the classes and the professors.
