Austin College vs Northwestern College vs University of Novo Mesto vs KCA University vs Cégep de l'Outaouais

Side-by-side comparison from 78 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Austin College: wins 0/3 categories
Northwestern College: wins 0/3 categories
University of Novo Mesto: wins 0/3 categories
KCA University: wins 0/3 categories
Cégep de l'Outaouais: wins 0/3 categories
Jenderal Soedirman University - Unsoed: wins 0/3 categories
Muhammadiyah University of Purwokerto: wins 3/3 categories
Comparing
Sherman, Texas, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Environmental Sciences
Orange City, Iowa, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Early Childhood Education
Novo mesto, Slovenia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Nairobi, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
71 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Technology
Gatineau, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: BA (hons) English
Best programme: Bachelor of Law LLB
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.32
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Win
Location
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.46
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
Professors
4.50
5.00
Not rated
4.49
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Internationality
3.50
5.00
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Student life
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.44
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
4.00
5.00
Not rated
4.61
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.65
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Small class sizes & accessible professors
  • +High-quality education & academic support
  • +Positive campus environment
  • +Supportive staff and instructors
  • +Value for money and competitive pricing
  • +Program alignment with career goals

Nothing to show

  • +Practical and well-structured programs with supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Quality education and career-oriented focus
  • +Positive campus environment for collaboration and personal development

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive lecturers and clear teaching
  • +Abundant student organizations and practical experience opportunities
  • +Good facilities and positive campus environment
  • +Supportive Islamic environment and religious development
  • +Modern and comfortable campus facilities
  • +Strong focus on knowledge acquisition and spiritual remembrance
Cons
  • -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Limited career support and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and in need of repair.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are not engaging or relevant.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum
  • -Excessive workload and poor support
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and limited course availability frustrate many students.
  • -Ineffective communication and administrative issues cause significant distress.
Rating summary
What students say

An analysis of university ratings reveals strengths in academic and student engagement aspects. Professors received an excellent score of 4.5, while student life and internationality also scored well at 3.5. Facilities and value for money are rated a solid 3.5 and 4 respectively. However, the university's location is a notable weakness, scoring only 2. Accommodations also present a moderate area for improvement with a rating of 3.

Performance in key areas is highly varied. The institution excels in **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** received the lowest possible ratings, indicating significant weaknesses in these aspects of the university experience.

Nothing to show

This university excels in several key areas, with particularly high marks for Value (4.61), Professors (4.49), and Location (4.46). Student Life and Internationality also received strong scores, indicating a vibrant and diverse campus experience. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a considerably lower rating of 3.65.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a perfect score. **Location** is another highly rated aspect. Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality**, all receiving moderate ratings. The university also performs well regarding its **Professors** and **Value**.

Across all assessed aspects, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating exceptional performance. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a flawless 5 out of 5. This suggests a consistently outstanding experience for students in every key area. No weaknesses are identified within this rating set.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being favorable. Students praise small class sizes, accessible professors, and quality education. The campus is considered beautiful, though some buildings need updating.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and no negative feedback (~0%), reviews highlight strong program alignment with career goals and excellent student support from admissions to instructors. Competitive pricing for degrees is also noted.

Nothing to show

With ~93% positive reviews, students praise the university for its rewarding academic programs, well-structured curriculum, and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers. Practical learning and a collaborative campus environment are frequently highlighted.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4 out of 5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight increasing learning potential and growing through study programs and student organizations. Facilities are also noted as adequate.

The sole review is highly positive (100%), praising the campus and Islamic curriculum for comfortable learning. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
0%
63%
0%
33%
100%
4★
100%
0%
0%
27%
0%
33%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
33%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My university

I joined this university, not because it offers a high education but because of its conducive environment and supportive lecturers and professors. You can find people with different cultural backgrounds, which makes the university inclusive. One problem that the university shares with most universities in Nairobi, is the lack of ergonomic chairs in ICT rooms and the library.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close