Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Escuela de Administración de Negocios - EAN vs Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Innovative programs with practical application and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors dedicated to student growth
- +Comprehensive and ethical education fostering personal and professional development
- +High academic quality and standards
- +Flexible study options and time management
- +Committed and qualified professors
- +Strong focus on entrepreneurship integrated across programs.
- +Diverse language options and specialized career paths within Modern Languages.
- +High-quality teaching, student well-being, and administrative improvements.
- +Supportive and caring staff offering detailed explanations.
- +Emphasis on self-reliance and critical thinking in learning.
- +Flexible online learning options with advanced technological resources.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
- +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
- +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
- -Inefficient administrative and communication issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum development is a significant concern.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are also significant drawbacks.
- -Inflexible curriculum and teaching methods are a recurring point of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
An overview of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Internationality and value are also rated very favorably. Facilities, location, and accommodation, while still respectable, represent the weaker aspects of the university's offerings, scoring lower than other categories.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.
This institution garners excellent marks, with professors and location standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a perfect score. Student life and value also score highly, indicating a positive overall experience. Facilities and accommodation are rated well, while internationality is a solid but comparatively lower-scoring aspect.
This institution receives consistently high marks, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.5. **Value** and **Internationality** are the lowest-rated areas, though still solid at 4.0. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Location also demonstrate strong performance, with ratings around 4.3 to 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.
With ~100% positive feedback and an average of 4.54/5 stars, reviews highlight an innovative and comprehensive education. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, practical projects, and opportunities for growth and international experiences.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight the university's focus on sustainable entrepreneurship, diverse language options within programs like Modern Languages, and quality teaching.
Students report a highly positive experience (~100% of feedback), praising strong organizational support, attentive staff, and engaging learning methods. Some minor navigation and response time issues were noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Ean University is one of the most socially diverse institutions you can find in Bogotá. Its guiding principle is "Sustainable Entrepreneurship"—a philosophy deeply embedded in the curriculum. Regardless of their major, every student is required to engage with this concept at some point in their academic journey. I am currently enrolled in the Modern Languages program, which offers a strong foundation in Spanish and English, along with the option to study additional foreign languages such as German, French, Italian, or Portuguese. The program also allows students to choose from three different areas of emphasis: translation skills, digital communication, or organizational communication. I genuinely enjoy studying at Ean University. It equips students with essential tools for entering the labor market. Even as a student in the Faculty of Humanities, I am required to learn about business and economic strategies—something I find particularly valuable for those who aspire to go beyond language learning and theoretical knowledge. Another aspect I appreciate is how the university supports students in developing their start-up ideas, regardless of whether those ventures are currently successful or still in the early stages. Although the campus is relatively small, it is well-equipped. The classrooms are spacious and offer a variety of useful resources. There are also several social spaces for students to enjoy, including a nap room, a game room, limited green areas, and more. Additionally, the university is located in one of the best areas of the city, surrounded by restaurants, shopping malls, and countless activities—making student life both convenient and vibrant. In my experience, the professors have been excellent—knowledgeable, respectful, and supportive. However, I’m aware that some of my peers have had less positive interactions. That said, not everything has been perfect. The course registration process can vary between being highly efficient and extremely chaotic. I’ve had instances where I had to argue with administrative staff just to complete a simple request, which often took a long time to resolve. Additionally, many students (though not myself) have raised concerns about the curriculum including courses that don’t seem essential to our field—such as statistics, multiple entrepreneurship classes, and geopolitical studies. Overall, my experience at Ean University has been very positive, though there is definitely room for improvement, particularly in administrative processes.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show