Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN

Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC (5.00)
Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 0/3 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 2/3 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN: wins 1/3 categories
Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC: wins 0/3 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.98
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Location
3.95
4.50
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.52
4.00
4.50
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.29
5.00
2.00
5.00
4.00
2.00
Not rated
Student life
4.44
4.00
4.50
Win
4.00
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Value
4.33
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.80
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Innovative programs with practical application and real-world projects
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors dedicated to student growth
  • +Comprehensive and ethical education fostering personal and professional development
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
  • +Excellent teaching quality and teacher attentiveness
  • +High-quality education provided by the institution
  • +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
  • +Diverse and in-demand programs
  • +Convenient campus access

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and communication issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum development is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of responsiveness to student concerns is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

An overview of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Internationality and value are also rated very favorably. Facilities, location, and accommodation, while still respectable, represent the weaker aspects of the university's offerings, scoring lower than other categories.

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

Offering a truly standout experience, this university excels in its **Accomodation**, achieving a perfect score. Its **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are also strong points, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. The university's **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** are rated competently at 3, indicating areas for potential development alongside its already impressive strengths.

This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~100% positive feedback and an average of 4.54/5 stars, reviews highlight an innovative and comprehensive education. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, practical projects, and opportunities for growth and international experiences.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

The single review expresses strong satisfaction, particularly praising the excellent teaching approach and thoroughness of instructors. This positive feedback represents 100% of the feedback, with an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
58%
40%
67%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
38%
60%
33%
50%
100%
0%
0%
3★
4%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close