Universidad de los Andes - UNIANDES vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA

Side-by-side comparison from 68 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC (5.00)
Universidad de los Andes - UNIANDES: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 3/5 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 1/5 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 1/5 categories
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC: wins 0/5 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.69
4.43
5.00
Win
4.00
4.86
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.17
4.57
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.43
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.52
4.57
4.50
5.00
4.57
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.43
4.29
2.00
5.00
Win
3.29
2.00
Not rated
Student life
4.31
4.71
Win
4.50
4.00
4.29
3.00
Not rated
Value
4.33
4.43
5.00
5.00
4.71
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.05
4.71
Win
4.00
4.00
4.17
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Rigorous, deep, and innovative academic programs with opportunities for interdisciplinary study.
  • +Inspiring and experienced international faculty offering precise and relevant learning.
  • +Stimulating learning environments with extensive campus facilities and a strong sense of community.
  • +High-quality, experienced faculty
  • +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
  • +Excellent academic training and professional growth opportunities
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
  • +Innovative and practical programs with real-world application
  • +Supportive and experienced instructors
  • +Valuable facilities and career opportunities
  • +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
  • +Diverse and in-demand programs
  • +Convenient campus access

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations from staff.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of academic support.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administration.
  • -Outdated or insufficient facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often deemed inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives high marks overall, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area at 4.69. Professors are also highly rated (4.52), alongside a strong showing for Internationality (4.43) and Value (4.33). Student Life scores well at 4.31. The weakest, though still solid, areas are Location (4.17) and Accomodation (4.05).

Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations across numerous aspects. Student life and accommodation stand out as the strongest areas, achieving the highest scores. Conversely, internationality is rated slightly lower than other categories, representing the weakest performing metric. Facilities and value received comparable, solid ratings, while professor and location scores were also very strong.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

With a robust showing in several key areas, this university excels in its **Facilities**, earning a near-perfect score. **Value** and **Professors** also received commendably high marks. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. While **Student Life** and **Accomodation** received solid scores, they represent areas with room for growth when compared to the university's strongest attributes.

This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 46 out of 47 reviews being positive, students praise enriching academic opportunities like double majors and innovative teaching methods such as PBL. The university is lauded as number one in Colombia for its rigorous structure and comprehensive curriculum.

All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and strong professional training.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

Reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students praise excellent facilities, well-maintained equipment, and innovative programs. Technical and soft skills development, along with valuable professor support, are frequently mentioned.

With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
64%
86%
67%
0%
43%
100%
0%
4★
34%
14%
33%
50%
57%
0%
0%
3★
2%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close