Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina vs Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL vs Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC
Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High quality programs and professional teachers
- +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
- +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
Nothing to show
- +Quality programs and affordable tuition
- +Practical experience and real-world application
- +Career advancement opportunities and international agreements
- +Diverse faculties and engaging university activities
- +Strong analytical and technical skills, especially in mathematics and data
- +Passion for learning and pursuing advanced studies
- +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
- +Diverse and in-demand programs
- +Convenient campus access
- +Strong social and community focus
- +Early patient contact and practical skill development
- +Student voice and equitable treatment
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
- -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
- -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
Nothing to show
Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.
Nothing to show
The university receives exceptionally strong feedback in several key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning near-perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as comparatively weaker aspects, scoring notably lower. The value for money is also rated favorably, though not as highly as the top-tier categories.
This institution earns excellent scores in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a strong foundation. Student life and internationality are areas for potential growth, with both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture, particularly in its core offerings and infrastructure.
This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.
Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
All reviews are positive (100%), highlighting quality study programs, affordability, and enriching experiences. Students appreciate transformative programs, skilled teachers, and practical application opportunities. The university also fosters business sector support and international specialization agreements.
With an average rating of 5/5, university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Feedback highlights strong mathematical interests and analytical skills, alongside participation in research and academic events. The university offers diverse faculties and engaging activities.
With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show