ESADE Business School vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universidad Pontificia Comillas - ICAI-ICADE vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 193 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive, intense, and up-to-date academic programs with practical application
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth beyond academics, including leadership and diverse experiences
- +Strong career support, excellent placements, and networking opportunities
- +Approachable, supportive professors and engaging teaching
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world application
- +Flexible hybrid learning options and personal development
- +Academic rigor & professional quality of faculty
- +Strong career prospects & employer connections
- +High-quality facilities & positive campus experience
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- +Practical, project-based learning with real-world application
- +Strong professional network and career preparation
- +Supportive faculty and international environment
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor handling of financial matters and logistical challenges.
- -Lack of focus on critical thinking and intellectual development.
- -Negative social environment and perceived unfair financial practices.
- -Low English proficiency of professors
- -Poor organization and lack of care for international students
- -Disappointing program content and teaching quality
- -Lack of support and uncaring staff/professors.
- -Poor quality of teaching and exam structure.
- -Ineffective international student support systems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
Performance across key university metrics shows varied strengths. Professors receive the highest marks, followed closely by value and internationality. Student life and location also score well. The university's weakest areas are facilities and accommodation, though both still achieve respectable scores.
This institution is rated highly for its professors, achieving a score of 4.1. Facilities also score well at 4.0. Areas receiving lower scores include accommodation and internationality, both around 3.5. The university presents a generally positive profile, with particular strengths in academic and campus resources, while areas like student housing and global diversity could see further development.
Offering a well-rounded experience, the university excels in its **Location**, receiving a perfect score. **Facilities** and **Professors** also stand out with strong ratings, both nearing a score of 4. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the lowest-rated aspect, with **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scoring below average. Overall, the institution presents a positive, though not uniformly exceptional, academic and living environment.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Remarkable scores are evident across most surveyed aspects of this university. Professors and location stand out as exceptionally strong areas, both scoring near perfect marks. Student life and facilities also received very high praise. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, though it still maintains a respectable rating. Internationality and value for money are also well-regarded.
~92% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful staff, a supportive environment, and practical learning opportunities. The remaining ~8% of feedback mentions concerns about value and IT infrastructure.
~76% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable professors, engaging content, and practical learning. A small percentage of feedback noted low English proficiency from some professors and organizational issues.
With an average rating of 4.3/5, ~95% of reviews are positive, praising academic and professional growth opportunities, excellent facilities, and experienced professors. A small percentage of feedback (~5%) noted issues with staff and professor interactions.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97% 4-5 stars), highlighting valuable technical knowledge, practical learning, and professional network development. No negative feedback was provided.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
Nothing to show
Uncaring staff, professors, and international program directors. I don't understand why this is an International University that is open to all students. The treatment that I received at this school was nothing more than appalling.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
