UCES vs University for Business and Technology - UBT vs TED University vs Joaquim Chissano University - UJC vs Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: TED University (5.00)
UCES: wins 0/6 categories
University for Business and Technology - UBT: wins 1/6 categories
TED University: wins 3/6 categories
Joaquim Chissano University - UJC: wins 0/6 categories
Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM: wins 1/6 categories
Universidade São Tomás: wins 1/6 categories
Polytechnic University Maputo - apolitécnica: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Ankara, Turkey
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
3.33
4.57
Win
3.50
Not rated
3.20
3.00
2.00
Location
4.00
4.29
5.00
Not rated
3.25
5.00
3.00
Professors
4.00
4.29
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.20
4.00
2.00
Internationality
3.67
3.86
4.00
Not rated
4.20
Win
3.00
3.00
Student life
3.67
3.57
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.40
3.00
2.00
Value
3.67
4.29
4.00
Not rated
4.60
5.00
Win
2.00
Accommodation
3.00
2.71
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible scheduling and multiple campus locations
  • +Positive overall college experience
  • +High-quality academics and expert faculty
  • +Prestigious reputation and good learning conditions
  • +Ample opportunities for academic growth and advancement
  • +Diverse and English-taught programs with highly qualified professors
  • +Engaging extracurricular activities and clubs
  • +Well-maintained campus facilities and study spaces

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality and qualified professors
  • +Free tuition and accessible entry
  • +Good reputation and campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and course content.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently cited complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and communication problems.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Insufficient resources and support for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university presents a solid profile, excelling particularly in the quality of its professors and its attractive location, both scoring a perfect 4. Student life, internationality, and value are also strong points, all rated at a good 3.67. However, accommodation is identified as a weaker area, receiving a rating of 3, with facilities also trailing slightly behind at 3.33.

Boasting a strong showing, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, earning a near-perfect score. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Value** also received commendably high marks. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. **Student Life** and **Internationality** fall within the mid-range, indicating room for improvement.

An overview of the university's ratings reveals an exceptional academic environment, with professors receiving a perfect score. Location also scores highly. Student life and accommodation are also considerable strengths, both rated at 4.5. The university performs well in internationality and value, but facilities stand out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5.

Nothing to show

Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The highest marks were achieved in **Value** (4.6) and **Professors** and **Internationality** (both 4.2), indicating significant strengths in these areas. Conversely, the university received its lowest scores for **Accomodation** (3), followed closely by **Facilities** and **Location** (both 3.2). Student life received a moderate rating of 3.4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.25 average rating, most feedback is positive (~74%) highlighting dynamism and flexibility in course scheduling and venue options across multiple locations. No negative feedback was received.

Students praise UBT for its prestigious reputation and high-quality academic programs, particularly in computer science. The university offers good learning conditions and a strong scientific environment, with expert faculty. No negative feedback was reported.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight a diverse learning environment, knowledgeable professors, and ample extracurricular activities. Well-maintained facilities and a fully English-taught curriculum are also appreciated.

Nothing to show

With a ~4/5 average rating, nearly all reviews praise the university's qualified staff and academic quality. Some mention challenges like course length and subject availability.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
71%
100%
0%
20%
0%
0%
4★
25%
29%
0%
0%
60%
0%
0%
3★
75%
0%
0%
0%
20%
100%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close