United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Johan Cruyff Institute vs University of Amsterdam - UvA vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs TIAS School for Business and Society
Side-by-side comparison from 279 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +Accessible programs and flexible study structures
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Well-designed, up-to-date curriculum
- +Balanced theory/practice with real-world application
- +Diverse and international student community and faculty
- +High-quality, challenging education with expert guest lectures
- +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
- +Engaging professors and insightful discussions
- +Engaging, hands-on learning connected to real careers.
- +Supportive, diverse community and international connections.
- +Vibrant campus life and modern facilities.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Lack of administrative and faculty support
- -High costs with perceived low value and outdated facilities
- -Poor communication and inflexible policies
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and ineffective curriculum are common complaints.
Nothing to show
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
This university scores exceptionally well in several key areas, with Location standing out as the highest rated at 4.59. Internationality also receives a strong score of 4.49. Conversely, Accomodation is the weakest point, with a significantly lower rating of 2.96. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are all rated around the 4.0 to 4.2 mark, indicating solid but not exceptional performance in these domains.
This institution shows a strong performance in key areas, with Internationality (4.26) and Value (4.19) receiving the highest marks. Professors (4.13) also earned a notably positive rating. Student Life (3.98) and Location (3.96) are also well-regarded. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, which received a considerably lower score of 3.11.
Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in **Location** and **Facilities**, both receiving ratings above 4.2. **Student Life** and **Value** also score well, indicating a positive student experience and perceived return on investment. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** emerge as areas with the lowest scores, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects of university life. The average rating across all categories remains solid.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
~96% of reviews are positive, praising accessible programs, supportive lecturers, and useful facilities. A small ~4% of feedback highlights concerns about value, student support, and communication.
~93% of 51 reviews are positive, highlighting good theory-practice balance, knowledgeable lecturers, and program flexibility. No negative feedback was recorded.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.
Around ~99% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive community and modern, hands-on learning connected to real-world careers. There are no negative reviews to summarize.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
I didn’t felt the program was worth my money and it was definitely not what I expected. From the professors to the actual syllabus I didn’t learned much and I feel this debt I just acquired was definitely a waste of time a big mistake
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
