United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Tenri Health Care University vs Xiamen University - XMU vs ISG International Business School vs Zayed University
Side-by-side comparison from 57 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
Nothing to show
- +Excellent learning environment and broad academic opportunities
- +Strong programs in Oceanography, Industrial Sciences, and Economics
- +Diverse professional subjects across Science, Liberal Arts, and Engineering
- +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
- +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
- +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
- +Exceptional faculty and academic programs
- +Outstanding facilities and campus environment
- +Strong preparation for the workforce
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities
- +Practical learning and development opportunities
- +Strong, relevant programs with theoretical and practical focus
- +Supportive faculty and enriching campus environment
- +Affordable fees and flexible learning options
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Racism and bullying are experienced by international students.
- -Lack of support for students in distress is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Poor communication from the institution is a significant source of dissatisfaction.
- -Unprofessional administration and some teachers.
- -Unsatisfactory academic practices in specific departments.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant delays and frustration.
- -The university leads to wasted time and financial resources.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
Nothing to show
This university presents a mixed bag of ratings. Its strongest aspects lie in its accommodations, internationality, and professor quality, all scoring a solid 3.5. Student life and value also received respectable scores of 3. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are its facilities, with a score of 2.5, and its location, which received the lowest rating of 2.
This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Professors**, earning a rating of 4.46, closely followed by **Facilities** at 4.43 and **Value** at 4.38. **Student Life** also scores well with 4.35. The **Location** receives the lowest rating at 4.13, while other aspects like Accomodation and Internationality are also solid.
This institution receives favorable marks for its **Facilities** (4) and **Professors** (4.17). Areas requiring improvement include **Accomodation** (2.67) and **Student Life** (3.5). Other aspects like **Location** (3.6), **Internationality** (3.83), and **Value** (3.67) fall within a moderate range.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas. Location and student life are particularly strong, both receiving scores above 4.2. Value also stands out with a rating of 4.25. However, internationality represents the weakest area, with a considerably lower score of 3.25. Facilities and accommodation also fall in the mid-range.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
Nothing to show
One out of two reviews was positive, citing a great learning environment and diverse opportunities. The other review, representing approximately 50% of feedback, was negative and described experiences of racism and difficult administration for international students.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.
Zayed University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise exceptional academic programs, knowledgeable faculty, and outstanding facilities. Minor concerns are virtually absent.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate around 83% positive feedback praising supportive faculty and good facilities. Some students, representing about 17%, noted average performance in specific departments and unprofessionalism from some staff.
Nearly all (94%) student reviews are positive, praising well-rounded programs, knowledgeable faculty, and vibrant campus life. A small percentage (6%) of negative feedback highlights issues with mark retrieval and administrative delays.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I appreciated the practical and interactive classes, and the professors were very supportive, making learning enjoyable. I would like to see more student activities and leadership opportunities to further enhance the experience. I encourage the university to continue expanding mentorship and leadership programs for students."