United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Tohoku University - TU vs ISG International Business School vs University of Applied Sciences Kiel - FH KIEL vs Tokyo Zokei University

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 2/6 categories
Tohoku University - TU: wins 3/6 categories
ISG International Business School: wins 1/6 categories
University of Applied Sciences Kiel - FH KIEL: wins 0/6 categories
Tokyo Zokei University: wins 0/6 categories
Yamagata University - YAMADAI: wins 0/6 categories
RTM Al-Kabir Technical University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Best programme: Advanced Molecular Chemistry
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.75
Win
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.75
Win
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.50
4.50
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.25
4.50
Win
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +Excellent academic reputation and research opportunities
  • +Supportive learning environment and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching study abroad experience
  • +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
  • +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
  • +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
  • +Practical and theoretical learning through well-designed curricula.
  • +Strong emphasis on job-relevant skills and future career prospects.
  • +Opportunities for international and multicultural exposure.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of maintenance are significant concerns.
  • -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration and faculty causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with administrative inefficiencies and poor communication.
  • -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

Overall, this institution garners impressive scores across several key aspects. **Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality all received a strong 4.5 rating**, indicating excellent performance in these areas. The **Value for money stands out with a perfect score of 5**. The **Location and Accommodation are rated at 4**, which are solid but represent the comparatively weaker areas.

This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.

Considering the provided ratings, the university presents a uniformly neutral profile, with no specific areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Every surveyed aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received a rating of zero. This suggests a consistent, albeit unremarkable, performance across all evaluated facets of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

All three reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Recurring themes highlight outstanding experiences, a good learning environment, and helpful faculty.

All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.

Students highlight excellent laboratory facilities, a well-designed curriculum for practical and job-related knowledge, and good international exposure. The average rating is 4/5, with positive feedback representing 100% of reviews.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
75%
33%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
67%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close