United International Business Schools - UIBS vs BAU Centro Universitario de Artes y Diseño de Barcelona vs RWTH Aachen University vs ISG International Business School vs Osaka University
Side-by-side comparison from 80 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Industry-expert professors and practical, real-world projects
- +Diverse, multicultural student environment promoting collaboration
- +Comprehensive and complete programs covering various creative skills
- +Strong academic reputation and quality of teaching
- +Practical application of knowledge and research opportunities
- +Excellent support for international students
- +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
- +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
- +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
- +Welcoming academic atmosphere and helpful staff
- +Affordable and tasty food options
- +Excellent professors and academic rigor.
- +Vibrant student life and extracurricular opportunities.
- +Strong career prospects and respected degrees.
- +Flexible learning for working professionals
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +Practical and relevant curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Lack of respect and poor treatment from staff and faculty.
- -Ineffective teaching, unclear explanations, and neglect of pedagogical skills.
- -Administrative issues and difficulties with student support services.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
- -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support cause dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management incompetence is a significant issue.
- -Systems and educational structure fail to meet expectations.
- -Outdated and ineffective materials are a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Communication and support are lacking.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This institution garners exceptional scores across multiple key aspects, including its facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, the accommodation received a significantly lower rating of 1, indicating a considerable area for improvement.
The university receives a commendable rating of 4.03 for Internationality, indicating a strong global presence. Location also scores highly at 3.94. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.07. Other aspects like Facilities (3.80), Student Life (3.60), and Value (3.99) fall within a solid mid-to-high range, while Professors average a respectable 3.57.
This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.
This institution garners excellent feedback, with perfect scores awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation. Its location also receives strong marks. The weakest area identified is internationality, scoring 3.5, suggesting room for growth in global engagement. Overall, the university offers significant value, indicated by its solid rating of 4.
A mixed but generally positive performance emerges from these university ratings. The institution excels in areas such as **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving a strong 3.6. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest point, rated at a lower 2.4, while **Facilities** also scored below average at 2.8. Other aspects like **Location** and **Accomodation** fall within the moderate range.
Overall, this university garners strong marks across several key areas. Student life and location stand out with the highest ratings at 4.75 and 4.7 respectively. The university also scores very well in facilities, professors, and internationality, all at 4.6. Accommodations, while still a positive score at 4.39, represent the weakest area of evaluation.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
All 3 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the strong creative foundations, practical projects, and industry-expert professors. The multicultural environment and diverse course offerings were also highlighted.
Most reviews are positive (~74%), praising the program structure, research opportunities, and international student support. Some mention repetitive topics or a desire for more interactive lectures. A small portion (~14%) expresses concerns about hierarchy and teaching quality.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4 out of 5, approximately 50% of feedback is positive, highlighting an excellent academic environment with friendly staff and affordable, delicious food. There is no negative feedback recorded.
Most reviews are positive (~60%), highlighting vibrant student life, excellent professors, and job-market-aligned programs. One negative review (~20%) criticized management and education structure. The average rating is 3.4/5.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (95%) highlights flexible online learning, practical curriculum, and knowledgeable, approachable faculty. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
A master of immersive and comprehensive quality focused on people with little or no design knowledge. I had an excellent experience, the only thing that perhaps did not convince me was that the final work is done as a group.
I’m studying B.Sc. Electrical Engineering and Information Technology at RWTH Aachen. I’m currently in my 3rd semester. Although i find our subjects pretty hard to pass, i believe that this is the sign of quality education. I have troubles with some topics but our lecturers are always open to help and they also arrange online meetings to discuss our difficulties. What i also like is that you will have to choose a specific branch of your study after 2nd year, so that you’ll be more focused on your future area of expertise
Nothing to show
Excellent academic environment. Friendly lab mates and professors. Food service is inexpensive and delicious. The only thing I dislike was the extreme humid and hot summer days. Other than that, everything is excellent.
I've never seen such incompetence anywhere else. management is terrible system doesn't live up to expectations education in most institutions completely lacks structure cheap material that doesn't work
Nothing to show
